Top 10 Worst Websites You’ll Wish You Hadn’t Seen
Do you ever open up a really badly designed website and wish you hadn’t? I’ve had the misfortune to visit a few shocking sites recently and here is a list of the very worst. If you are a designer feel free to send them an email offering your services.
If your website is on this list please don’t be offended, although you may wish to consider a redesign.
Top of our list and probably the worst of the bunch is this UK insurance company. Not content with using yellow and pale green on the same page they have made the page refresh every single second just so you don’t miss it. Also check out the quality pages such as this one with more html errors (check the title tag) than you can count. Extra points granted due to the waste of a good domain name.
Its not really clear what (or who) Franz is but you won’t miss that “Home” button. The title is nice and descriptive as well.
MSY is an Australian technology company boasting “more than 10 years in the computer industry”. Unfortunately their definition of “computer industry” clearly doesn’t encompass web design as pages such as this one selling Flash memory and other assorted products demonstrates.
Seriously this is painful to watch. Would you hire VF Designer?
This online ministry website seems to think that making people blind will help spread the faith. They even helpfully provide a series of well designed banners for you to use when you link to them.
This image heavy Norwegian gadget site has more pictures than flickr and takes an age to load thanks to the html image resizing. It didn’t seem to render properly in any of my browsers.
Another site wasting a great domain name is 00.com which utilises the least user friendly Flash navigation system we have had the pleasure to use.
Web Wizz have been given the dubious honour of having designed two sites on the list. Lets hope www.posture.co.uk is suitably pleased with the design work. Helpfully Web Wizz will register a domain name for just £89.99 initially, plus £2 per month.
Ling’s Cars was featured recently on the BBC’s Dragons Den program and really tries hard to provide a personal touch to her car leasing website. Unfortunately this means ignoring a few of the user friendly features on more conventional sites. Just try navigating round a few pages and you will see that the mass of information at the top isn’t just on the homepage, its on all the pages.
Helpfully Ling has created a nice guide on how you should be building your site:
Most business make mistake of paying a company to build page, without learning. Learn! Modify, change. Don’t pay the idiots to do this, do it yourself. Treat webpage like business office or shop. If you want to move a desk in office you move it. Put calendar on wall, you put. Do the same on website. Do every day. So simple. All your customers can see this. They get “feeling” from it.























Aww now that just makes me feel so much better about my own sites! Though I owe it all to those talented Wordpress theme designers.
Caroline Middlebrook October 31, 2007 1:22 pm | Reply
You forgot Aaron Wall’s first site www.newnavy.us.
Dave October 31, 2007 2:10 pm | Reply
the worst
Roy October 31, 2007 2:54 pm | Reply
Why people are still paying to host such websites? One of the mentioned site is offering site design and have whole load of explanation about websites, it has hint there the website was there at around 1998. Gosh..
Vincent Chow October 31, 2007 3:56 pm | Reply
this is a great post, and the best list i’ve ever heard.
sirjorge October 31, 2007 4:27 pm | Reply
Great list, I’ve been looking round trying to find a site which would beat these 10 but im not sure it’s possible!
B10G October 31, 2007 5:41 pm | Reply
£89.99 to register a domain name AND £2 a month?
Don’t use them, I can do all that for a one-off charge of £100
It annoys me to think that they may actually con someone into paying that….
Chris October 31, 2007 7:04 pm | Reply
Ling’s is a p*sstake, shurely?
db
David Bradley October 31, 2007 7:09 pm | Reply
That image heavy Norwegian one isn’t bad. I guess the loading could prove an irritation, but I wouldn’t call it ugly.
Paradoxical Entity October 31, 2007 7:27 pm | Reply
Wow, flashback!
How about this banner:
www.aanmelden.com/images/banners/aan468a.gif
(submit your website to 70,000 search engines)
Wiep October 31, 2007 8:03 pm | Reply
I’m going to have nightmares about these websites tonight.
Jordan Levy October 31, 2007 8:58 pm | Reply
Some good finds. Here is another good one. plywoodstormclip.com
Nate October 31, 2007 9:01 pm | Reply
Are you serious? That Norwegian site is dog..
Adam Taylor October 31, 2007 10:34 pm | Reply
Thanks for not including me on your list.
Steven Snell October 31, 2007 11:30 pm | Reply
Loving your post. I’m too afraid to look at the mentioned websites. Danny.
Danny Lister November 1, 2007 12:13 am | Reply
Ewww. They are hideous! That jesus one is hell to the eyes, why use a horizontal scrolling background image of rainbow colours. Yuk.
Dale Hay November 1, 2007 4:46 am | Reply
Wow. Just… wow.
I especially like the one offering to design your page for you.
It makes my brain hurt just to think about it.
Best one was the first. Look at the source; that’s why MS Word should never be used for design…
Andrew L. November 1, 2007 10:34 am | Reply
I don’t actually understand that, is it really so hard to redesign site?
AucklandSeo November 1, 2007 10:48 am | Reply
i love them !
emil November 1, 2007 11:25 am | Reply
WOW! I’ve always wanted to write a post like this but I’ve never seen sites THIS bad. Amazing job!
James Omdahl November 1, 2007 6:38 pm | Reply
I suppose they work well as some weird form of linkbait. I cant see how anyone would get a car off Ling even if its cheap would you ever trust anything from a website like that!
James S November 1, 2007 6:49 pm | Reply
This page is gold!
My company had a site like those before I got hired and insisted on changing it.
Thanks God I insisted, or the whole Diggsphere could have been digging my company’s lameness.
Exaakax November 1, 2007 6:51 pm | Reply
I worked for this company! They sucked!
http://www.computer-physicians.com/
Recone Helmut November 2, 2007 7:28 am | Reply
It is hard to grasp, but there are people out there with NO concept of design or aesthetics. Couple that with the attitude, “Why should we pay someone a fortune to design our site? It’s easy, John in IT can do that”, and some bright spark, John, who knows how to use 5 basic HTML tags and there is your result!
markowe November 2, 2007 11:21 am | Reply
These are really awful, and I think the Jesus and VF Designer sites are vying for worst of the worst. Ling is kinda cute, though.
Jordan November 2, 2007 7:04 pm | Reply
ok-you guys gotta see this one:
note: these guys SELL COMPUTERS!
http://cbm-eureka.com/
eurekan November 2, 2007 11:13 pm | Reply
It would really take some effort to beat this list, nice job.
Scott November 3, 2007 5:08 am | Reply
I, too, tried the www.arngren.net site in multiple browsers and I can only say, “I think they meant it to look that way.” Firefox, Opera, and Safari all rendered it the same way for me, and IE slightly differently. Neither looked good.
I disagree about the spinning rainbow Jesus site, though. It’s definately the worst. I think I had a seizure just looking at it.
I am a bit embarrased to admit that I could have designed the blue-green and yellow insurance site, though. My taste is that bad. It’s why I don’t do web design, no matter how much someone asks. I’m addicted to the tag.
Pjay November 3, 2007 6:02 am | Reply
That Franz one - laugh all you like, but he apparently has over half a million visits, and a Pagerank of 4..! That’s more than I have, that’s for sure! Hmmm, how does it go again..? , {font-color: garish;}…
(P.S. Weird, your blog has me as having posted a blank comment…)
markowe November 3, 2007 9:08 am | Reply
Good find…. but most of them have a good PR…
Minterest November 4, 2007 3:37 am | Reply
There are some great tips for making pages almost as great as these at:
link
Jake November 4, 2007 1:17 pm | Reply
whew!…mine didn’t make it ^_^
Caribwebdev November 4, 2007 4:00 pm | Reply
If only I could show you the website my boss put up for our paper instead of paying me to do it. He takes the “bite off his nose to spite his face” to a new level.
Angela November 4, 2007 4:11 pm | Reply
Hey my blog not include?? It is quite surprised..
shy guy November 5, 2007 11:53 am | Reply
LOL. Man, this crap is the biggest joke i’ve ever seen.
Drew Bennett November 6, 2007 8:04 pm | Reply
The worst website I’ve ever seen is http://www.populationpaste.com
John Candy November 7, 2007 2:15 am | Reply
Some of the sites on there are offensive to me! Especially Web Wizz. I hope that is a joke, I really do.
Carly November 8, 2007 12:07 pm | Reply
Haha awesome post.
Re: MSY, you wouldn’t believe how popular they are. Often when you go to the stores, the line stretches right out the door.
The stock is just a mess everywhere so when you get to the front of the line you just tell the staff what you want. Crappy design but cheap prices = loyal customers.
Jonk : Bargains November 8, 2007 7:06 pm | Reply
That Ling has been spraying Whitespace Remover all over her site.
Montoya November 8, 2007 10:30 pm | Reply
I’m just glad that the websites I did back in the 20th century were on free hosts and have vanished by now (I think). I’m sure they were similar. I’m thinking that somebody just left these up since then and forgot about them.
Quotes November 8, 2007 11:28 pm | Reply
Hey, everyone, it’s fantastic to be on this list. I will be promoting my position soon on my site. Just to let you know that my website will move well over £25 million UKP of new cars at retail prices in 2008 (as I write this Nov 9th, I’m up to £23 million). That’s ALL from my website, I have no physical sales point. Goes to show, not everyone likes clean, cool design
Websites should give a warm feeling of individuality, I think. You can tell there are real people behind these sites, not just some corporate body paying £25k to a web-design company for the usual corporate rubbish.
See you online
LOADS of visitors to my site from here, btw.
Glad to see there are so many web-experts out there (you are funny onions
) - if anyone can beat my web sales (total income 2008 £250,000UKP - that’s over $1/2 million USD,) let me know and I’ll listen to your expertise. Hehehehe.
I’m based in Gateshead, UK.
Ling
LINGsCARS
Ling Valentine November 9, 2007 8:16 am | Reply
just another example:
http://web.archive.org/web/20010404002721/www.ncc.up.pt/~zp/
pz November 9, 2007 5:14 pm | Reply
You forgot goatse
Matthew November 11, 2007 5:47 pm | Reply
Honestly there is way too much stuff on ling cars. It hurts my eyes and doesn’t look at all professional. The fact that she has made so many sales is mind blowing to me. All I can say is congrats!
ben November 12, 2007 1:38 am | Reply
Ben, I know this is not the place to get into a discussion (maybe it is), but I will explain my reasoning, just so you don’t think I’m completely bonkers.
I work in an environment (new cars, UK) where the franchised dealer rules. They have posh brick and mortar premises but generally poor (no emotion) websites. Plus there are lots of companies doing what I do, new car brokering - of various flavours. They tend to have poor, non-dynamic or wrist-slashingly boring websites. ABC Leasing, that sort of name. All these websites built to a price and rarely updated, and with cars as content.
I am a Chinese bird moving new cars in the UK. Do I stand a chance? No. So… I decided to make my uniqueness my USP. Me. Now, I need traffic, for that I need lots of content. Natural Google searches account for more than 60% of all site traffic. I do not buy adwords. I go off on tangents and get publicity instead, like with my nuclear missile truck (really). When people arrive on my site, I need them to stick around, as I need to infect them with enthusiasm and emotion. Or else they will buy somewhere else, somewhere more professional. So… I make the site really rewarding. I don’t want to list the stuff on there, but for example I post 10 free lunches a day (dry noodles), plus I have had over 130,000 views of my viral, funny youTube vids. I have to be different, so I am. Some people stay for hours. Live chat. Webcams. Accurate info, loads of entertainment, much mockery. “I cannot do miracles, I am Chinese not Catholic”.
I cannot earn money being “professional” in the trad way, so I just provide the best service and publish over 700 customer letters. Fun sells, sex sells, emotion sells. These are all things cars have, so I use them. Professionalism rarely sells (maybe doctors and lawyers excepted). I don’t analyse my results as well as I could, I just count the UKP’s.
I do have the most environmental info, all the NCAP crash tests, all the car cc’s, worthy stuff like that.
The UK motor trade, in general, hate me for doing it like this. Mazda blacklist me, BMW complain I distress their “brand”, a finance company banned me for saying their service was “poor”. However, they can’t ignore me. I want to be the car customer’s champion.
Hope this helps, if not, take a big aspirin
. Sorry about the migraine my site can induce.
Ling Valentine November 12, 2007 8:25 pm | Reply
The only acceptable use of the blink-tag is:
Schrodinger’s cat is dead.
Kristoffer November 15, 2007 9:03 pm | Reply
I have to agree with Ling. What’s up front is what counts in the internet web business game. Lets face it, you only have approximately 30 seconds to convince a possible customer to your site that they need to stick around and look at what you have to offer. The best way to do that is to stick the product right in there face along with the price and more than likely they will buy it or leave it. Unfortunately with my site Best Jewelry Boutique I couldn’t get to a “one click sell” which is what you really want to achieve on any e commerce web site.
Guy Fuller November 19, 2007 4:20 am | Reply
i think i’m going to be sick… o_0
whit November 21, 2007 5:04 pm | Reply
What I noticed about Ling’s site, is it’s colourful, not the boring run of the mill, like the corporates sometimes have.
Thing is, corporates try to be ‘the professional’ - the ego gets the better of them and so they must display their expertise. The mind set is that a bunch of exams means they are better than the rest out there, well, Ling has 2 degrees, yet her site speaks more and does more for her than her qualifications ever could.
My argument is I couldn’t care less what someone’s exam results are. But can they do the job better…. It’s rare that a website ‘protects’ people, and that’s what people need.
PS — I have no connection with LingsCars.com
Christopher January 4, 2008 1:09 pm | Reply
Ling site is fowl is suck big time considering im a ict student training to be a web designer i can see how god awful that site is. I contains far to much information and half of it is completely of subject they go on to the website for insurance not stupid of key information quote being “i eat dragon for breakfast” that has nothing to do with car insurance her site is horrendous it breaks every rule i learned about making website it the worst way possible so here what i think of that site and you can quote me on this. I would rather chew glass than go on that site again
patrick January 13, 2008 4:25 am |
Replyha ha..
00.com a great domain name with such a cheap design.
Atleast now they have changed it!
Chetan January 15, 2008 10:27 pm | Reply
As it happens, I used to lecture on Graphic Design on a degree course. It’s a highly subjective business. There are no hard and fast rules. Uncluttered swiss railway signage is not necessarily ‘better’ than the front page of ‘The Sun’. It’s a question of taste, appropriateness for function and what works.
Lingscars.com is a brilliantly successful website around which Ling is building an extremely valuable business. It is highly distinctive, memorable and effective. It is beating the pants of its sparser, more restrained (and more boring) competitors’ sites every day. Her level of virtually viral site traffic is truly phenomenal. She is neither stupid nor ill-informed. The site became chaotic due to market forces and commercial evolution, like ‘The Sun’.
The deliberate cluttered ‘look’ is it’s unique point of difference.
Arty, spacious, stereotypically precious typography has got nothing to bring to the party!
Rick Blears January 16, 2008 1:19 am | Reply
Even without a Wordpress/Blogger theme I can design a better looking site than these!
I can do it in Frontpage better than these!
lisa February 9, 2008 7:04 am | Reply
The jesus one, shut down my mozilla. Otherwise it was very funny. I think our agency should take some tips, they are soooo damn colourful.
Thanks for sharing
claire stokoe February 15, 2008 12:53 am | Reply
Even using both sides of my brain I couldn’t process all the information on Lings site.
Tables and tables and tables and also some tables and not a summary, caption, colgroup or table header in sight.
I’d like to watch the reaction of a blind person listening to Lings site being read.
Guess blind people don’t drive cars then…
See, in everything there are little blessings.
Vulpine Mobile March 6, 2008 2:08 am | Reply
[…] Top 10 Worst Websites You’ll Wish You Hadn’t Seen […]
Blogging Up a Storm with BlogStorm Version 2 | John Chow dot Com March 7, 2008 6:24 pm | Reply
I hope you didn’t just stumble upon these sites hay what you gonnna do if they make money great for them
alexander batista March 8, 2008 4:04 am | Reply
I just through up a little in my mouth.
Shaun March 8, 2008 4:29 pm | Reply
OH man I wish I can have a site with that kind of STYLE. SEO it and promote my product successfully with this crappy funky look. lol
Kelvin Lai March 9, 2008 12:30 am | Reply
Amazing…now i’ll sleep better.
ajfiel March 9, 2008 9:47 am | Reply
Those sites should get a web designer,am glad i didn’t stumble on any of them.First impression matters alot especially in online adverts.Thanks for showing us these sites.
tyna March 10, 2008 4:05 pm | Reply
[…] Slechte websites Dit heeft niets met Jane te maken (compleet off-topic dus), maar ik (=Wilte) vind het zo grappig dat ik het jullie niet wil onthouden: Top 10 Worst Websites You’ll Wish You Hadn’t Seen. […]
Slechte websites « Jane Zijlstra March 22, 2008 8:53 pm | Reply
These are the people that usually get more work than the pros. This is the case in my area, it is obvious these sites are poorly designed.
People will pay for a cheap website likes those above shown, just to save money. But later on these are the same people that are complaining that may site is not getting any visitors or traffic.
Web Design Lincolnshire April 2, 2008 9:46 am | Reply