Thoughts on what the Google +1 button means for SEO

by Patrick Altoft on / 27 responses

Google has announced the +1 button which allows users to vote for specific search results, AdWords ads and (in a few months) pages on your website. The button is a vote to say you like the page, think it’s cool and would want to recommend it to your friends.

The key about this button is that your friends only see the recommendations when they are searching for the same thing you were searching for. This is in sharp contrast to Twitter and Facebook where you have to send the link when you are interested in it rather than when your friend is looking for the same thing. For news and current topical results Twitter & Facebook sharing is great, for ecommerce sites and non-topical content it doesn’t really work as well.

Google has built a business around showing users adverts and search results relevant to what they are searching for right now and this is why they have been able to monetise so much better than social networks.

There is a long standing argument that user data is easy to fake. It isn’t. Google has over 200 million Gmail users around the world and 133,000 people are using the Chrome extension to block sites from search results just 6 weeks after it launched.

In the tech community a lot of people have complained about the poor quality of Googles results but the vast majority of the complaints were constructive criticism – people want Google to get this right. If these people are willing to complain about things & download Chrome extensions then they will also be willing to give a quick +1 for pages and search results they find useful.

Our recommendation is for all sites to add the +1 button when it’s available in just the same way they would add Facebook and Twitter buttons.

Google has failed at adding social layers before with Bookmarks, Searchwiki and Buzz but something tells me this time they might just have got it right. Even if the results are only used for testing algorithms (like the Chrome extension was) rather than actually influencing results this is clearly an important step forwards.

Patrick Altoft is Director of Search at Branded3, a Leeds SEO & Digital Agency specialising in SEO, Web Design, Development & Social Media.

Get daily posts direct to your inbox

You can get our blog posts delivered for free by email every day - simply add your email address to the box above, or alternatively you can grab the RSS feed.

Comments

Read the 26 comments below, or add your own!

March 31, 2011 at 2:26pm

Will certainly be interesting to see how this affects PPC click-through rates.

Reply

March 31, 2011 at 3:30pm

“Read more about Thoughts on what the Google +1 button means for SEO by Blogstorm SEO Blog”

I have to disagree, this would be even easier to game than links. Not everyone has a website but most people have a google account, you could buy them like crazy. Mechanical turk ?

Reply

March 31, 2011 at 4:56pm

@PaulB – You could certainly buy ‘likes’ but I’m not sure that would help much. The key issue here is that you only see the +1 from those in your social circle. The majority of people you’ve described are unlikely to have much influence and/or extensive social circles…

Reply

March 31, 2011 at 8:39pm

I agree that this looks to be a very good move by google.

Have been trying to test it out myself, though, but not able to see the +1 button yet. Was wondering if there is a delay in being rolled out to the UK?

Reply

lee
March 31, 2011 at 9:02pm

Well most people who will sell +1′s from their account will sell lots of them – I think it would be extremely easy to isolate these people algorithmically and remove their votes from having any effect on rankings.

If someone +1′s a payday loan site and a casino site, their votes lose all seo benefit. If they +1 x number of ecommerce sites not from their own country, same.

I’d go one further and remove India, Philippines, Pakistan etc from passing any benefit also – we all know a lot of the spam is going to originate from there.

Then rule out everyone who doesn’t have a credit card on file, or who hasn’t sent x number of emails over the past month, etc etc

If Google do this smartly, it definitely won’t be easy to game :)

Reply

March 31, 2011 at 10:36pm

The thing about asking people to +1 something, if you ask them by email then Google can just read it out of gmail anway.

Reply

March 31, 2011 at 10:42pm

“Read more about Thoughts on what the Google +1 button means for SEO by Blogstorm SEO Blog”

lol, please remove tinfoil hat

Reply

April 4, 2011 at 5:06am

lets wait for the STREAM of spammy +1 actions…

Reply

April 4, 2011 at 3:48pm

i agree with what paul says
if it start acting as a major component in search engine ranking than people will start spamming it.
Google must have planned something for this scenario i am sure

Reply

April 6, 2011 at 9:21am

I am unable to see this button yet.

Reply

April 6, 2011 at 9:34pm

@william
they have just announced it, it will be released later

Reply

April 7, 2011 at 10:27am

Is it just me? or is everyone thinking – massive facebook rip off haha! :]

Reply

April 8, 2011 at 9:49am

I think I will do a lot of surfing under a proxy…really hate Google watching and checking everything.

Reply

April 11, 2011 at 12:11am

@Ian, I think google had a like/recommendation system back in the early 2000′s by way of smileys so if anything FB is copying then (although I must admit FB did do it much better)
I doubt +1′s are going to be for friends circles only, I think that people you’ve never met on the other side of the world will influence your results via their +1′s eventually either directly via the +1 or indirectly by affecting the search algorithm.
At the moment I can’t see it working, who googles somethings and then recommends it before even having checked it out? and who would come back to the SERPS to rate something after they’ve moved away to the website? Not many i don’t think.

when they roll out inpage +1′s it will gain some traction and I think it is a major factor for ecommerce sites.

I also don’t think google will allow full blown manipulation of this, they’re too smart. When you +1 something they will take a heap of things into consideration such as your activity on gmail, youtube, age of account, amount of +1′s you’ve given out, etc etc. +1′s from new gmail accounts with minimal activity and email contacts will be so heavily discounted they will not be worth the effort. Kinda like spammy linkfarms now.

Reply

Tom
June 7, 2011 at 11:09am

I agree with David, i can’t see Matt Cutts allowing something to go through if it was going to be easily spammed. The amount of access and data they have available for individual accounts will give them plenty of background on ‘authoritative’ +1s vs spammy ones.

Reply

June 7, 2011 at 6:55pm

The votes of +1 button will be used in google search. So, it’s better to do as google like and wait for the result.

Reply

June 9, 2011 at 4:50am

i feel like google is turning into big brother watching us and telling us what to do…scary stuff

Reply

John Doe
June 19, 2011 at 4:33pm

@Aptus
Wake up man, they are already “big brothering” you for years now. If you don’t want that, you better stop using google!

Reply

November 7, 2011 at 9:01pm

It will be a decent indicator for a few years – that way they can incentive websites to push hard for +1s, which in turn gets their code onto even more sites and accumulates more data.

Reply

December 13, 2011 at 7:50pm

Do you really think that Google +1 will hep to be high ranked in SERP?Nowadays people sell online facebook fans anf Twitter followers…Google +1 will be also for sell.

Reply

December 16, 2011 at 4:16pm

Google are so clever, What on-line marketers haven’t completely realised is that they affect internet trends. I believe marketers are responsible for the rise in blogs as its marketers who figured that they were useful when marketing on line started to create blogs that ordinary users would be interested in etc. etc. What Google have done is created a social network to compete with Facebook, then they add a function within this network which could or could not (doesn’t matter either way for point I’m making) affect SEO. What this leads to is all the on-line marketers out there signing up to Google+ and therefore starting the trend towards Google+. Well done Google.

Reply

January 15, 2012 at 10:17pm

@ Friv from SEO point of view, there are two possibilities that improve rankings in SERPs,
1) Google+ links are Dofollow and and if you create a relevant circle then they will surely boost you up!

2) Google is now including few more social factors just like Bing do! And I am getting pretty good results from them! For else things I hate Google + :)

Reply

February 16, 2012 at 6:10pm

I’m certain google+ will have its SEO benefits, but is anyone actually using it?

Just logged in to my account have around 150ish in my circles mostly from the digital industry and the last persons upadte was 3 days ago.

Reply

February 23, 2012 at 12:27pm

I would go so far to say that Google+ was a mess, but the pre-poster is right, the most people still use facebook, google plus is more for the geeks. I also don’t really notice an advantage for SEO with this button (being clicked) on my sites.

Reply

February 23, 2012 at 12:30pm

Compete with facebook? 850 M vs 5 M. Google+ is a joke.

Reply

March 12, 2012 at 1:44pm

Is there a study focusing on the effects of the Google Plus Button (number of clicks) on SERPs?

Reply

1 trackbacks

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Fields marked with an asterisk are required.
 

  *

  *

You can use one of the following tags:
<a href=""><blockquote><code><em><strike><strong>