Search engine optimisation from Blogstorm

The UK Yahoo Directory Dichotomy

by Patrick Altoft on April 9, 2008

Being in the UK has it’s benefits but the confusion surrounding our version of the Yahoo Directory isn’t one of them.

A few years ago people from the UK were happy to pay the US$299.00 non-refundable recurring annual fee in the knowledge that our site would be listed in a directory that helped our search rankings and actually sent traffic.

Then in 2005 Yahoo stopped charging a fee to submit sites to the UK directory and while this was initially thought to be great news people quickly realised that sites were not actually being reviewed - it became almost a DMOZ situation with an increased volume of submissions and a massive drop in revenue making it impossible for Yahoo to actually review sites on time.

The problem

Let’s say I want to submit Blogstorm to the UK directory in the UK > Internet > Search Engine Optimisation section, here is the screen I’m greeted with:

yahoo1.png

Now if I visit the main Yahoo Directory and the United Kingdom > Internet > Search Engine Optimization
section I get this screen:

yahoo2.png

So my choice is to either submit for free to uk.dir.yahoo.com and risk not being included or to submit to the UK section of the dir.yahoo.com US version and pay $299 every year for life.

Looking at the latest submissions there are plenty of UK sites being added to the US directory so why doesn’t Yahoo just charge for submission to the UK version as well?

Do you need to pay every year?

Paying a $299 fee to keep your site in the directory every year is pretty steep but totally worthwhile. It gives Yahoo the resources to review sites every year and keep the directory clean.

Subject to Section 1.3 above, the current Recurring Annual Fee is US $299.00 for web sites that do not offer adult content and/or services and is US $600.00 for web sites that do offer adult content and/or services. If Yahoo! is unable to successfully charge your card or if the charge is refused, your site will be removed. IT IS THE APPLICANT’S RESPONSBILITY TO KEEP CREDIT CARD INFORMATION CURRENT.

Not one of my sites has ever been removed for cancelling the charge after the first year. Look at any category in the directory and I bet you can find expired sites - how is this possible if Yahoo is reviewing all the sites every year?

Are all these people really paying $299 every year to Yahoo for sites that are expired? Most credit cards only last a few years and I doubt people will update their details with Yahoo when they change.

Have you every been removed for non-payment? Have you ever been listed for free in the Yahoo UK directory?

You can get our blog posts delivered for free by email every day - simply add your email address to the box below or alternatively grab the RSS feed.

Read some similar posts

Published in: Link Building delicious | digg | reddit | StumbleUpon | Google Bookmarks | Sphinn

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Neil 09/04/2008 at 1:23 pm

Yes and no.

2 David Bradley 09/04/2008 at 6:25 pm

Submit your RSS feed (not your feedburner version, the native URL) to their system by adding it to your My Yahoo! page and it will be subsumed into Yahoo proper. It’s not quite as effective nor as fast as it was when they first started accepting RSS feeds, but it does work.

db

3 Conrad 10/04/2008 at 4:18 am

I can’t see the problem here because if you pay to submit a site to: http://dir.yahoo.com/Regional/Countries/United_Kingdom/... you will automatically get added to: uk.dir.yahoo.com/….

4 Lea de Groot 10/04/2008 at 5:59 am

I have registered expired sites and not paid the annual fee, and they are still appearing in the yahoo dir. Nope, the $299 is not being spent on reviews, despite what Google says makes us good little link builders.

The yahoo.com.au directory is in the same situation - local submissions are unpaid, and so are never reviewed. (I’d like at least some of my sites go through, guys!)
I guess only the US market is important to them? :(

5 Stephen 10/04/2008 at 10:16 am

Nope, the good times are over. They’ve started removing sites that don’t renew.

e.g. I submitted a site in Dec 06. I got a renewal request from Yahoo! in Dec 07, final warning in January, notice that it had been removed in early February, and it was actually removed in mid February.

(It may be different for sites that have been in the directory for longer, or didn’t pay to get in.)

Of course, that’s not to say there aren’t ways around this…

6 David Eaves 10/04/2008 at 10:51 am

They removed one of my listings very recently because I did not renew.

7 Siddharth 16/04/2008 at 6:33 pm

Yahoo! 299$ fees for the directory listing is really very expensive. I don’t think its worth it. I will advice that in this amount someone should use Google AdWords to publicise his/her website and build a genuine audience. If the Yahoo! charges was for life term then the situation was different but every year, no chance.

8 Mark Cuda 17/04/2008 at 9:37 pm

Nice write-up, I’ve never seen that directory before, but I’ll look into it.

Thanks for bringing it out, I’ll check it out for sure :)

Regards,

- Mark Cuda | http://www.monkeyblogger.com

Leave a Comment (get an avatar from Gravatar first)

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>