<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Digg Users Are Revolting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/the-digg-users-are-revolting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/the-digg-users-are-revolting/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig McCoy</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/the-digg-users-are-revolting/#comment-61336</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1043#comment-61336</guid>
		<description>I have often wondered this myself.  Like many people out there I wonder what the long term life span of sites like digg will be.  I don&#039;t know that it won&#039;t exist in a few years, but I think that if it still does it will be structured differently than it is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have often wondered this myself.  Like many people out there I wonder what the long term life span of sites like digg will be.  I don&#8217;t know that it won&#8217;t exist in a few years, but I think that if it still does it will be structured differently than it is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/the-digg-users-are-revolting/#comment-61168</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 05:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1043#comment-61168</guid>
		<description>Patrick,you are really something,I benefit a lot from you and your blog,appreciate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick,you are really something,I benefit a lot from you and your blog,appreciate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/the-digg-users-are-revolting/#comment-60618</link>
		<dc:creator>allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1043#comment-60618</guid>
		<description>digging without viewing the story shows exactly why certain sites get on the frontpage. and frankly if you don&#039;t click through to the stories, then how do you know that you want to &quot;share&quot; them with others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>digging without viewing the story shows exactly why certain sites get on the frontpage. and frankly if you don&#8217;t click through to the stories, then how do you know that you want to &#8220;share&#8221; them with others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adi Moga</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/the-digg-users-are-revolting/#comment-60513</link>
		<dc:creator>Adi Moga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1043#comment-60513</guid>
		<description>I quite Digg long time ago due to their policy, i recommend you all yahoo buzz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite Digg long time ago due to their policy, i recommend you all yahoo buzz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vipey</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/the-digg-users-are-revolting/#comment-60446</link>
		<dc:creator>vipey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1043#comment-60446</guid>
		<description>hmm interesting, im sure hes not using any kind of voting script  but why digg a story you havent read? but also what is the big problem? es not cheating anyone or scamming, thats the problem with digg, its like yahoo answers, to many do gooders</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm interesting, im sure hes not using any kind of voting script  but why digg a story you havent read? but also what is the big problem? es not cheating anyone or scamming, thats the problem with digg, its like yahoo answers, to many do gooders</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Altoft</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/the-digg-users-are-revolting/#comment-60444</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Altoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1043#comment-60444</guid>
		<description>Tamar I knew somebody sharp eyed would pick up on that :-). The only reason I dugg it was so I could find it later, kind of like a bookmark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tamar I knew somebody sharp eyed would pick up on that <img src='http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> . The only reason I dugg it was so I could find it later, kind of like a bookmark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamar Weinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/the-digg-users-are-revolting/#comment-60441</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamar Weinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1043#comment-60441</guid>
		<description>But you Dugg the story, Patrick.  Why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you Dugg the story, Patrick.  Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maing</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/the-digg-users-are-revolting/#comment-60429</link>
		<dc:creator>Maing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1043#comment-60429</guid>
		<description>You can digg stories directly from google reader with 2 greasemonkey scripts.
It can be possible to digg 1 story per second (without reading the story)

I bet MrBabyMan is using those scripts,Maki made a blog post few months ago describing all these tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can digg stories directly from google reader with 2 greasemonkey scripts.<br />
It can be possible to digg 1 story per second (without reading the story)</p>
<p>I bet MrBabyMan is using those scripts,Maki made a blog post few months ago describing all these tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Wilsdon</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/the-digg-users-are-revolting/#comment-60408</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Wilsdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1043#comment-60408</guid>
		<description>@Rishil 

Yes Maki seemed to just get attacked by association which was sad. There was no evidence to say he broken the rules. I liked the comment that said Digg should ban these top users *in case* they sell advertising? eh what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rishil </p>
<p>Yes Maki seemed to just get attacked by association which was sad. There was no evidence to say he broken the rules. I liked the comment that said Digg should ban these top users *in case* they sell advertising? eh what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Wilsdon</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/the-digg-users-are-revolting/#comment-60407</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Wilsdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1043#comment-60407</guid>
		<description>@Patrick

Yep, I guess it depends on the pattern. If he voted everything up from the popular/upcoming page for example then yes, it&#039;s possible to just work your way down the list digging everything with 2 secs/item. You&#039;d need to look at what was voted for and see if the pattern could have been done manually in that time. 

But like you say - reading the items is completely out of the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Patrick</p>
<p>Yep, I guess it depends on the pattern. If he voted everything up from the popular/upcoming page for example then yes, it&#8217;s possible to just work your way down the list digging everything with 2 secs/item. You&#8217;d need to look at what was voted for and see if the pattern could have been done manually in that time. </p>
<p>But like you say &#8211; reading the items is completely out of the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

