<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sitelinks for Subfolders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-for-subfolders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-for-subfolders/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-for-subfolders/#comment-131095</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2111#comment-131095</guid>
		<description>what is the requirements for getting normal  sitelinks? is it mainly based on high traffic? What is considered high traffic? PageRank? Links?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the requirements for getting normal  sitelinks? is it mainly based on high traffic? What is considered high traffic? PageRank? Links?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie Phung</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-for-subfolders/#comment-130569</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Phung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2111#comment-130569</guid>
		<description>@hamish - Sitelinks in general, or Sitelinks just at the subdirectory level? I&#039;ve seen Google drop the number of Sitelinks displayed (from 8 links to 4, to 3 even), at the top domain level. Haven&#039;t noticed any fluctuations at the subdirectory level, although I don&#039;t track those very closely aside from just checking examples I blogged about previously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@hamish &#8211; Sitelinks in general, or Sitelinks just at the subdirectory level? I&#8217;ve seen Google drop the number of Sitelinks displayed (from 8 links to 4, to 3 even), at the top domain level. Haven&#8217;t noticed any fluctuations at the subdirectory level, although I don&#8217;t track those very closely aside from just checking examples I blogged about previously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamish</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-for-subfolders/#comment-130534</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2111#comment-130534</guid>
		<description>I have also seen some sites lose theirs, get them back and lose them again in the past few weeks. 

Anyone else seeing some eratic changes recently?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have also seen some sites lose theirs, get them back and lose them again in the past few weeks. </p>
<p>Anyone else seeing some eratic changes recently?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie Phung</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-for-subfolders/#comment-130486</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Phung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2111#comment-130486</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s been happening since before January actually. And I&#039;ve been noticing it on more and more sites since then - even ones that aren&#039;t obviously &quot;high authority&quot; sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s been happening since before January actually. And I&#8217;ve been noticing it on more and more sites since then &#8211; even ones that aren&#8217;t obviously &#8220;high authority&#8221; sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrickaltoft (Patrick Altoft)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-for-subfolders/#comment-132600</link>
		<dc:creator>patrickaltoft (Patrick Altoft)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 22:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2111#comment-132600</guid>
		<description>Sitelinks for Subfolders: Over the last few weeks we?ve noticed Google has been giving out sitelinks to su.. http://tinyurl.com/dfpys4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sitelinks for Subfolders: Over the last few weeks we?ve noticed Google has been giving out sitelinks to su.. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/dfpys4" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/dfpys4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

