<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sitelinks are no longer an indication of trust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:57:46 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seo Recommended Readings, April 23, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-201724</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo Recommended Readings, April 23, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-201724</guid>
		<description>[...] Sitelinks are no longer an indication of trust By Patrick Altoft [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sitelinks are no longer an indication of trust By Patrick Altoft [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prowler</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-137233</link>
		<dc:creator>Prowler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-137233</guid>
		<description>I am adding a comment after so many months. I have noticed that if a site is down for some reason which previously had a sitelink, when it comes back online, it loses the sitelink for some time. This reinforces the theory that Google still assigns &quot;trust&quot; value to sites which it has enabled sitelinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am adding a comment after so many months. I have noticed that if a site is down for some reason which previously had a sitelink, when it comes back online, it loses the sitelink for some time. This reinforces the theory that Google still assigns &#8220;trust&#8221; value to sites which it has enabled sitelinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-50064</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-50064</guid>
		<description>Yes, I haven&#039;t ever connected sitelinks with trust either. But I do think that commanding a larger area of the search results page should translate into greater traffic... So I&#039;ve been obsessed with them for quite some time.

...And uh... I&#039;m still waiting for mine. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I haven&#8217;t ever connected sitelinks with trust either. But I do think that commanding a larger area of the search results page should translate into greater traffic&#8230; So I&#8217;ve been obsessed with them for quite some time.</p>
<p>&#8230;And uh&#8230; I&#8217;m still waiting for mine. <img src='http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Altoft</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-21719</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Altoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-21719</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mendax</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-21718</link>
		<dc:creator>Mendax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-21718</guid>
		<description>I guess none of you read &lt;a href=&quot;http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=%2220060287985%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20060287985&amp;RS=DN/20060287985&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this patent&lt;/a&gt;, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess none of you read <a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=%2220060287985%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20060287985&amp;RS=DN/20060287985" rel="nofollow">this patent</a>, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPC Search Engine Internet Marketing &#124; Professional SEO Company</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-21686</link>
		<dc:creator>PPC Search Engine Internet Marketing &#124; Professional SEO Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-21686</guid>
		<description>Sitelinks created automatically by an algorithm. Google says they &quot;analyze the link structure of your site to find shortcuts.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sitelinks created automatically by an algorithm. Google says they &#8220;analyze the link structure of your site to find shortcuts.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Little League Coach</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-21466</link>
		<dc:creator>The Little League Coach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-21466</guid>
		<description>how does one get sitelinks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how does one get sitelinks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EDL seo</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-21458</link>
		<dc:creator>EDL seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-21458</guid>
		<description>But the google customer still believes it is an authority website...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the google customer still believes it is an authority website&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-21367</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-21367</guid>
		<description>I know trust is huge for Google, but I never connected sitelinks with trust.  It was my impression (and of course I can&#039;t come up with any specific examples now) that sitelinks appeared when Google felt that you were far and away the #1 site for that search term.  Obviously in many cases that implied a significant level of trust (e.g. a search for &quot;nursing jobs&quot;), but in some cases it was just because the search term was so unique that one site clearly matched it better than all others, regardless of trust level (&quot;shoemoney&quot; comes to mind).

Now they have &lt;i&gt;definitely&lt;/i&gt; expanded the number of searches for which they show sitelinks, but I don&#039;t know that that&#039;s an indication that they have waived the trust component.  The new sites I&#039;ve seen with sitelinks are all highly trusted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know trust is huge for Google, but I never connected sitelinks with trust.  It was my impression (and of course I can&#8217;t come up with any specific examples now) that sitelinks appeared when Google felt that you were far and away the #1 site for that search term.  Obviously in many cases that implied a significant level of trust (e.g. a search for &#8220;nursing jobs&#8221;), but in some cases it was just because the search term was so unique that one site clearly matched it better than all others, regardless of trust level (&#8220;shoemoney&#8221; comes to mind).</p>
<p>Now they have <i>definitely</i> expanded the number of searches for which they show sitelinks, but I don&#8217;t know that that&#8217;s an indication that they have waived the trust component.  The new sites I&#8217;ve seen with sitelinks are all highly trusted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-21310</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/sitelinks-are-no-longer-an-indication-of-trust/#comment-21310</guid>
		<description>I was wondering what was happening when just about everyone was getting sitelinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering what was happening when just about everyone was getting sitelinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
