Comments on: Should Google reset a sites rankings when it’s transferred?

By: Emil

Emil — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:35:53 +0000

All right I got that domain with PR7 and in last week I was working on some quality backlinks and now my new domain is PR8, so the myth is busted, which makes it untrue.

Also I wanted to see how Google trust my example.com so under the Blogroll (since I am using wordpress) I placed 4 clients links just to see what’s going to happend. So far one of them was indexed by google and on my client domain PR jumped from PR0 to PR3.

It’s a risk that I was willing to take, but now I see that it works, no matter if you leave your front page unchanged, or that you do the updates slowly or like me 100% total change of everything.

So it does work.

By: Patrick Altoft

Patrick Altoft — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:37:05 +0000

Yes but how much traffic does Google send…….

By: Patrick Altoft

Patrick Altoft — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:36:29 +0000

I think they are just reserving the right to reset the trust but they don’t always do it. This makes it a risk buying a new site.

By: Emil

Emil — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:46:23 +0000

Comment on: Matt says if a domain changes hands, Google resets the links vale to zero/near zero

Sorry, I just can’t get this at all.
If this is true, does that mean when Google purchased YouTube their score was reset to zero?

I need somebody to explain this to me, as I really don’t get it?

By: Emil

Emil — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:24:30 +0000

Hi Patrick,

Nothing changed at all and also, the website on that specific domain was gone for awhile, so when I got the domain it was GoDaddy’s Parking Page.

Right now my site is online, 100% everything different:

Name
Address
City
Country
Name Servers
Design

Verified with Google Webmaster, Analytics etc…

Still solid PR7.

By: Patrick Altoft

Patrick Altoft — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:39:28 +0000

PR wouldn’t change until the next update whatever happened. Are your search rankings still the same?

By: Emil

Emil — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:28:56 +0000

Comment on: Matt says if a domain changes hands, Google resets the links vale to zero/near zero

Just purchased domain name with PR7 let’s call that domain example.com.

example.com was registered in 2006 with 128 Google Backlinks and solid PR7, all great links. In 2008 or better said a week ago, example.com was on GoDaddy’s Aftermarket with the starting bid of $10, at the time there was only one bidder, so I placed a bid. To cut the story short, I own that domain name now and PR still hold same solid PR7, NOTHING was reset at all, the ownership of example.com not only changed names but Countries as well.

When I checked whois I realized that this example.com did not even change the original date/year of registration!

This applies (I guess) only of the domain name was actually deleted, not if the domain change hands, so I am living proof that (Matt says if a domain changes hands, Google resets the links vale to zero/near zero) is NOT TRUE!

Thanks

By: john andrews

john andrews — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:48:40 +0000

um, “live blogging every word”? Really? I posted some notes of the session… with a few quotes… not nearly “every word” and certainly not intended to be a transcription of the session. I clipped 80% of my own notes so as to limit the post to just what I thought needed more discussion.

Great to see discussion.. but maybe change that entre’?

By: Scott

Scott — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:29:33 +0000

Changing hands could be defined as expiring and someone catching/registering it afresh in this example and not really apply to a sale or transfer I would expect.

By: Shane

Shane — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:22:05 +0000

That may be what he said, but it’s just not true. I have purchased very prominent sites 5 years ago, 5 weeks ago, and everywhere in between, and none of them have ever had their trust reset. I’ve also never been very careful about making changes slowly or not changing the site completely. In one extreme case several years ago, in fact, literally the only URL we kept intact was the homepage. All other URLs were 301′d or disappeared altogether.

I’m interested to hear more about that comment, whether it was indeed what he said, and what exactly he meant by it.