<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Resistant Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/seo-resistant-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/seo-resistant-search/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KDye Vertical Leap</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/seo-resistant-search/#comment-9779</link>
		<dc:creator>KDye Vertical Leap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/seo-resistant-search/#comment-9779</guid>
		<description>The problem is that some people associate SEO with clicking on results that don&#039;t have any relevance to what they were looking for.

Good ethical SEO is about getting sites to rank for terms that they deserve to rank for because the site is relevant, and searchers will be interested in using/buying from/contacting the site that they click on in the SERP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that some people associate SEO with clicking on results that don&#8217;t have any relevance to what they were looking for.</p>
<p>Good ethical SEO is about getting sites to rank for terms that they deserve to rank for because the site is relevant, and searchers will be interested in using/buying from/contacting the site that they click on in the SERP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Masked Millionaire</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/seo-resistant-search/#comment-9620</link>
		<dc:creator>The Masked Millionaire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/seo-resistant-search/#comment-9620</guid>
		<description>The problem with SEO is that the more you think you know the more you find out you don&#039;t know hardly anything.  People keep saying that it is easy and that anyone who wants to can learn it.  I just don&#039;t think that is true.  It has come to the point that if SEO is important to you then you might as well admit to yoursef that you will have to hire an expert to do the heavy lifting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with SEO is that the more you think you know the more you find out you don&#8217;t know hardly anything.  People keep saying that it is easy and that anyone who wants to can learn it.  I just don&#8217;t think that is true.  It has come to the point that if SEO is important to you then you might as well admit to yoursef that you will have to hire an expert to do the heavy lifting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Banfield</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/seo-resistant-search/#comment-9617</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Banfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/seo-resistant-search/#comment-9617</guid>
		<description>I think this is another great post that takes a similar but still unique perspective to this issue &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vanessafoxnude.com/2008/03/03/seo-is-the-worst-thing-ever-invented/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Vanessa Fox&lt;/a&gt; brought up yesterday.

In my opinion, the problem with all this &quot;SEO is Evil,&quot; &quot;SEO Resistant Search,&quot; etc. is the view of SEO by people who aren&#039;t directly involved in the field.  It seems like the general outsider&#039;s view of SEO has gone from &quot;optimizing for search engines&quot; to &quot;manipulating search engines.&quot;

While it is true that there are people who exploit search engines for their personal monetary gain (but let&#039;s be honest, you can find exploitative/manipulative companies &amp; individuals in any industry), all of the &quot;experts&quot; that are speaking out against the SEO industry need to realize that most of the major firms, as you put it, are simply giving &quot;the search engines what they want.&quot;  For example, if large, well-known brands simply ignored search engine marketing, it would probably be harder to find many of them, which would actually be detrimental to the user&#039;s experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is another great post that takes a similar but still unique perspective to this issue <a href="http://www.vanessafoxnude.com/2008/03/03/seo-is-the-worst-thing-ever-invented/" rel="nofollow">Vanessa Fox</a> brought up yesterday.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the problem with all this &#8220;SEO is Evil,&#8221; &#8220;SEO Resistant Search,&#8221; etc. is the view of SEO by people who aren&#8217;t directly involved in the field.  It seems like the general outsider&#8217;s view of SEO has gone from &#8220;optimizing for search engines&#8221; to &#8220;manipulating search engines.&#8221;</p>
<p>While it is true that there are people who exploit search engines for their personal monetary gain (but let&#8217;s be honest, you can find exploitative/manipulative companies &amp; individuals in any industry), all of the &#8220;experts&#8221; that are speaking out against the SEO industry need to realize that most of the major firms, as you put it, are simply giving &#8220;the search engines what they want.&#8221;  For example, if large, well-known brands simply ignored search engine marketing, it would probably be harder to find many of them, which would actually be detrimental to the user&#8217;s experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sucker</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/seo-resistant-search/#comment-9590</link>
		<dc:creator>Sucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/seo-resistant-search/#comment-9590</guid>
		<description>Exactly right.  Mahola and Facebook can be manipulated just like Google and DMOZ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly right.  Mahola and Facebook can be manipulated just like Google and DMOZ&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janusz</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/seo-resistant-search/#comment-9589</link>
		<dc:creator>Janusz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/seo-resistant-search/#comment-9589</guid>
		<description>Good post Patrick. I completely agree. Every search ranking algorithm can be gamed by SEOs for the same reason as every DRM or software protection can be cracked. There is no ultimate algorithm, it just a constant fight between search engines and SEOs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Patrick. I completely agree. Every search ranking algorithm can be gamed by SEOs for the same reason as every DRM or software protection can be cracked. There is no ultimate algorithm, it just a constant fight between search engines and SEOs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/seo-resistant-search/#comment-9586</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/seo-resistant-search/#comment-9586</guid>
		<description>Anything written in software can be dismantled and reverse engineered. All attempts to stop it are just temporary. And any search engine that believes it can is living in some sort of Utopian mindset. It does raise the bar for the manipulators, but that only makes the rewards more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything written in software can be dismantled and reverse engineered. All attempts to stop it are just temporary. And any search engine that believes it can is living in some sort of Utopian mindset. It does raise the bar for the manipulators, but that only makes the rewards more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

