<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Results are 3rd Most Trusted Online Information Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/search-results-are-3rd-most-trusted-online-information-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/search-results-are-3rd-most-trusted-online-information-source/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Optimization Services</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/search-results-are-3rd-most-trusted-online-information-source/#comment-95686</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Optimization Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-95686</guid>
		<description>findings are significant because they show that although people might not trust a corporate blog or news in Search Engine Optimization Services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>findings are significant because they show that although people might not trust a corporate blog or news in Search Engine Optimization Services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The branding spinoff from SEO (from Business Marketing Online)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/search-results-are-3rd-most-trusted-online-information-source/#comment-94965</link>
		<dc:creator>The branding spinoff from SEO (from Business Marketing Online)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-94965</guid>
		<description>[...] However, here&#8217;s an interesting result that&#8217;s had me questioning that advice slightly. Search Results are 3rd Most Trusted Online Information Source on Blogstorm relays some survey results which suggest that where you appear in the search engines [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, here&#8217;s an interesting result that&#8217;s had me questioning that advice slightly. Search Results are 3rd Most Trusted Online Information Source on Blogstorm relays some survey results which suggest that where you appear in the search engines [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agitationist</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/search-results-are-3rd-most-trusted-online-information-source/#comment-92895</link>
		<dc:creator>Agitationist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-92895</guid>
		<description>And then there&#039;s the lack of trust in corporate blogs, which I&#039;ve discussed here:
http://agitationist.com/corporate-blogs-arent-trusted-forrester-research</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then there&#8217;s the lack of trust in corporate blogs, which I&#8217;ve discussed here:<br />
<a href="http://agitationist.com/corporate-blogs-arent-trusted-forrester-research" rel="nofollow">http://agitationist.com/corporate-blogs-arent-trusted-forrester-research</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about SEO as of December 15, 2008 &#124; The Lessnau Lounge</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/search-results-are-3rd-most-trusted-online-information-source/#comment-88071</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about SEO as of December 15, 2008 &#124; The Lessnau Lounge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-88071</guid>
		<description>[...] they most likely wouldnâ€™t be read by search engine bots. For the same reason, external links   Search Results are 3rd Most Trusted Online Information Source - blogstorm.co.uk 12/15/2008 A survey from Forrester shows that search results are the 3rd most [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they most likely wouldnâ€™t be read by search engine bots. For the same reason, external links   Search Results are 3rd Most Trusted Online Information Source &#8211; blogstorm.co.uk 12/15/2008 A survey from Forrester shows that search results are the 3rd most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Does Google Really Think About SEO? (Part One)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/search-results-are-3rd-most-trusted-online-information-source/#comment-86729</link>
		<dc:creator>What Does Google Really Think About SEO? (Part One)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-86729</guid>
		<description>[...] results that Google provides (for example, a study that was just released showed that SERPs are the third most trusted source of online information).Â  If Google stopped making people happy with their results (as a result of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] results that Google provides (for example, a study that was just released showed that SERPs are the third most trusted source of online information).Â  If Google stopped making people happy with their results (as a result of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/search-results-are-3rd-most-trusted-online-information-source/#comment-86545</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-86545</guid>
		<description>Wiki is a paradox. I have clients that tell me never to cite it in my articles and others who provide Wiki links as part of the brief when setting up a commission. Some sections, such as the chemistry section are pretty much 99%, the more political and alt culture areas are not. It can generally only be trusted if you already &quot;know&quot; the facts you&#039;re reading there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wiki is a paradox. I have clients that tell me never to cite it in my articles and others who provide Wiki links as part of the brief when setting up a commission. Some sections, such as the chemistry section are pretty much 99%, the more political and alt culture areas are not. It can generally only be trusted if you already &#8220;know&#8221; the facts you&#8217;re reading there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

