<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Previous Query&#8221; Refinement gets aggressive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/previous-query-refinement-gets-aggressive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/previous-query-refinement-gets-aggressive/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Previous Query Reason For Crazy Google Rankings? - Search Marketing Blog from Cincinnati, Ohio</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/previous-query-refinement-gets-aggressive/#comment-19613</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Previous Query Reason For Crazy Google Rankings? - Search Marketing Blog from Cincinnati, Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/previous-query-refinement-gets-aggressive/#comment-19613</guid>
		<description>[...] â€œPrevious Queryâ€ Refinement gets aggressive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] â€œPrevious Queryâ€ Refinement gets aggressive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judd Exley</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/previous-query-refinement-gets-aggressive/#comment-19275</link>
		<dc:creator>Judd Exley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/previous-query-refinement-gets-aggressive/#comment-19275</guid>
		<description>Like most things with the Googlemonster, I&#039;m sure it&#039;ll get smarter over time.

For now, I shudder to think of what will happen when my wife sits down to search for the nearest carpet store here in Perth and gets ads for clown pr0n.

I keed, I would never Google that kind of thing.  The results are rubbish anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most things with the Googlemonster, I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;ll get smarter over time.</p>
<p>For now, I shudder to think of what will happen when my wife sits down to search for the nearest carpet store here in Perth and gets ads for clown pr0n.</p>
<p>I keed, I would never Google that kind of thing.  The results are rubbish anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julien</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/previous-query-refinement-gets-aggressive/#comment-19203</link>
		<dc:creator>julien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/previous-query-refinement-gets-aggressive/#comment-19203</guid>
		<description>probably not a coincidence that &#039;loans&#039; is a far more profitable niche than seo consulting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>probably not a coincidence that &#8216;loans&#8217; is a far more profitable niche than seo consulting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kylah16</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/previous-query-refinement-gets-aggressive/#comment-19172</link>
		<dc:creator>kylah16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/previous-query-refinement-gets-aggressive/#comment-19172</guid>
		<description>If they are rolling it out to organic results does this mean that   no one will be able to claim top spot for a keyword anymore because it will be constantly changing depending on what the person searched for before?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they are rolling it out to organic results does this mean that   no one will be able to claim top spot for a keyword anymore because it will be constantly changing depending on what the person searched for before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/previous-query-refinement-gets-aggressive/#comment-19078</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/previous-query-refinement-gets-aggressive/#comment-19078</guid>
		<description>When I covered the patents recently (last summer) released pertaining to query refinement and user performance metrics I researched and played with a variety of approaches to find it indeed was fairly prevalent.

More here on the actual patent; http://www.reliable-seo.com/knowledge-base/technical_seo/ad_serving_and_user_performance_metrics.html

I also put a post on this topic (and more links) on the ol Blog (huomah).... it is the implications for the regular SERPs that is most interesting. Confirmation of the usage of user performance metrics is like a Pandora&#039;s box IMO. If this is the &#039;tip&#039; of the iceberg, what is lurking under the surface.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I covered the patents recently (last summer) released pertaining to query refinement and user performance metrics I researched and played with a variety of approaches to find it indeed was fairly prevalent.</p>
<p>More here on the actual patent; <a href="http://www.reliable-seo.com/knowledge-base/technical_seo/ad_serving_and_user_performance_metrics.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.reliable-seo.com/knowledge-base/technical_seo/ad_serving_and_user_performance_metrics.html</a></p>
<p>I also put a post on this topic (and more links) on the ol Blog (huomah)&#8230;. it is the implications for the regular SERPs that is most interesting. Confirmation of the usage of user performance metrics is like a Pandora&#8217;s box IMO. If this is the &#8216;tip&#8217; of the iceberg, what is lurking under the surface.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien van Holten</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/previous-query-refinement-gets-aggressive/#comment-18956</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien van Holten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/previous-query-refinement-gets-aggressive/#comment-18956</guid>
		<description>I think in most cases the CTR is fine. Since Google assumes people are refining their searches in the same general direction (loans -&gt; cheap loans).

However, if I would build this system I would check for the keyword direction for the current and previous keyword and wouldn&#039;t display ads from previous query&#039;s if they don&#039;t belong together (as seen here with SEO and loans).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in most cases the CTR is fine. Since Google assumes people are refining their searches in the same general direction (loans -&gt; cheap loans).</p>
<p>However, if I would build this system I would check for the keyword direction for the current and previous keyword and wouldn&#8217;t display ads from previous query&#8217;s if they don&#8217;t belong together (as seen here with SEO and loans).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

