<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Page load speed may be in Google 2010 algorithm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bed Guards</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/#comment-276177</link>
		<dc:creator>Bed Guards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3307#comment-276177</guid>
		<description>So do people think that page load speed has become important this year - I&#039;m not so sure.  Isn&#039;t activity the more important thing that Google has started to look at?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So do people think that page load speed has become important this year &#8211; I&#8217;m not so sure.  Isn&#8217;t activity the more important thing that Google has started to look at?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Design Georgia</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/#comment-248529</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Design Georgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3307#comment-248529</guid>
		<description>Great post ..keep up the good work..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post ..keep up the good work..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/#comment-206315</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3307#comment-206315</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s true- but what would be any eCommerce or flash websites</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s true- but what would be any eCommerce or flash websites</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google PageRank Speed improvements &#124; Douglas Radburn - douglasradburn.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/#comment-202480</link>
		<dc:creator>Google PageRank Speed improvements &#124; Douglas Radburn - douglasradburn.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3307#comment-202480</guid>
		<description>[...] Anyone wanting to know more about the algorithm hanges can check out http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anyone wanting to know more about the algorithm hanges can check out <a href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/#comment-198889</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3307#comment-198889</guid>
		<description>Iâ€™m not surprised to see this development in Googleâ€™s search algorithm, and think this could definitely be a good thing for the web in general. Poorly built sites can cause havoc for the end user, with slow download speeds, displaying incorrectly and usage of old technologies (such as tables)! Having Google give extra focus on well built sites that have had a lot of effort put into their end user experience is certainly a good thing.

What will be interesting to see here is how much a difference having a well built, fast site will make to your Google listings. If this is only a matter of a single position this would hardly be worthwhile, but if Google designates sites multiple positions higher then we could see a lot of sites being re-worked and re-built very soon!

With the ongoing development of Web 2.0 I wonder what other factors will be coming into the search algorithm next year. An interesting article, thanks for posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iâ€™m not surprised to see this development in Googleâ€™s search algorithm, and think this could definitely be a good thing for the web in general. Poorly built sites can cause havoc for the end user, with slow download speeds, displaying incorrectly and usage of old technologies (such as tables)! Having Google give extra focus on well built sites that have had a lot of effort put into their end user experience is certainly a good thing.</p>
<p>What will be interesting to see here is how much a difference having a well built, fast site will make to your Google listings. If this is only a matter of a single position this would hardly be worthwhile, but if Google designates sites multiple positions higher then we could see a lot of sites being re-worked and re-built very soon!</p>
<p>With the ongoing development of Web 2.0 I wonder what other factors will be coming into the search algorithm next year. An interesting article, thanks for posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Golden Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/#comment-195848</link>
		<dc:creator>Golden Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3307#comment-195848</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing!Its good for the public.. 
I hope all like that ...  


Keep going</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing!Its good for the public..<br />
I hope all like that &#8230;  </p>
<p>Keep going</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/#comment-195333</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3307#comment-195333</guid>
		<description>Im glad I installed the WP Super Cache plugin last week :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im glad I installed the WP Super Cache plugin last week <img src='http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tag44</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/#comment-195317</link>
		<dc:creator>tag44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3307#comment-195317</guid>
		<description>Yeah its an old news and i have read it a week ago in webpronews and some other SEO blogs, so be update with latest news as it comes, Patrick, its an request from all the regular readers of this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah its an old news and i have read it a week ago in webpronews and some other SEO blogs, so be update with latest news as it comes, Patrick, its an request from all the regular readers of this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/#comment-195299</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3307#comment-195299</guid>
		<description>Keep up Patrick...  

Old news already.

Even the Digitalpoint muppets are up to date on this.

What happened to your sharp on the ball posts, or are you turning into a regular &#039;rehaser of news&#039; Blogger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up Patrick&#8230;  </p>
<p>Old news already.</p>
<p>Even the Digitalpoint muppets are up to date on this.</p>
<p>What happened to your sharp on the ball posts, or are you turning into a regular &#8216;rehaser of news&#8217; Blogger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

