Organic results only make up 21% of Googles search result pages

by Patrick Altoft on November 30, 2009

Over the last few months Google has been really pushing local search in the UK (with plans to push it even more) and we are finding Local Business Results increasingly creeping into generic keywords such as mobile phones.

Today I thought it would be interesting to take the “mobile phones” search results and see what percentage of the page each element takes up. The results are below and you can click on the screenshot to see a full size version of the whole page.

The top 10 organic results now only account for 21% of the page with local listings taking up 9.3% – almost the same as the Adwords ads which take up 14.3%. Just under 50% of the page is either white space or navigation links.

Google area figures

Google results

Page real estate

Patrick Altoft is Director of Search at Leeds based digital & SEO agency Branded3. Patrick also runs Blogstorm.

You can get our blog posts delivered for free by email every day - simply add your email address to the box below or alternatively grab the RSS feed.

Read some similar posts

{ 17 comments… read them below or add one }

Hobo 30 Nov 2009 at 6:15 pm
Find me on Twitter

Great post. It’s funny – Google wants us to help them make their search engine better – why don’t they just give us back the old organic listings?

Hope Bing is taking note…..

More comments from Hobo
Eloi 30 Nov 2009 at 6:16 pm

Nice idea for a study.
However, did you not take into consideration the 7 other natural results that are under the local ones in your screenshot? that would be more like 65% if you did… Maybe i’m missing something, in which case shame on me etc etc.

Patrick Altoft 30 Nov 2009 at 6:36 pm
Find me on Twitter

Eloi the 7 natural listings below the organic results are taken into account in the figures. I just didn’t give them a label.

More comments from Patrick Altoft
Bill Marshall 30 Nov 2009 at 6:57 pm

Having recently switched to a new laptop I thought things were a bit crowded in Google results but hadn’t realised it was this bad! Thank heavens for the CustomizeGoogle Firefox plugin. Seems G are heading for the same old AltaVista scenario that got them their start in the first place. Bring back simple search!

Patrick Altoft 30 Nov 2009 at 7:11 pm
Find me on Twitter

Shaun I think we have to assume people click on the local results, otherwise Google wouldn’t show them.

More comments from Patrick Altoft
Hobo 30 Nov 2009 at 7:43 pm
Find me on Twitter

Patrick true – I’ve often wondered if one random local result at a time would be better tho instead of a big list (that in a lot of cases aren’t even that local).

More comments from Hobo
wil reynolds 30 Nov 2009 at 8:27 pm

I have been using the search term motorcycle to show this phenomenon lately. Tons of news results, images, local, etc.

Byron Surf 01 Dec 2009 at 12:14 am

Very interesting post. It depends on the industry/vertical as to how much Google is willing to spread the % across multiple elements. Verticals that have significant SEM spend such as travel, finance are less likely to see an increase in video, news, images etc.. into the SERPs. However move away from the Head verticals & the landscape is looking far more experimental & like what Patrick has displayed above.

It’s a changing landscape. I like the motorcycles example. I find the phrase Surfing to also be a good example of the changing Google Search results.

Organic Visits 01 Dec 2009 at 7:18 am

In the 21.0%, what is the percentage of clicks at the first position, second, third , fourth and fifth positions. Please let me know if there is any analysis.

patrenet 01 Dec 2009 at 9:51 am
Find me on Twitter

Le référencement naturel représentent 21% des résultats de recherche Google
http://patrenet.com/Le-referencement-naturel-representent-21-des-resultats-de-recherche-Google.html

More comments from patrenet
karen 01 Dec 2009 at 12:09 pm

Great post, I found those statistics very interesting.
Thanks

Nicolas AUVINET 01 Dec 2009 at 2:08 pm

Googles really forgot natural results… IMO gg is far from its best results with all those tricks now.

tag44 01 Dec 2009 at 2:25 pm
Find me on Digg | Facebook | Reddit | StumbleUpon | Twitter

Thanks for the post and for sharing the info on Google organic search and its results.

More comments from tag44
Zoran Rudman 01 Dec 2009 at 3:04 pm

How can we be sure that our business will be showed on the map?
What we have to do? I figured that Google is using country related yellow pages and then sorts out businesses by the cities and industry.

SEO Ireland 09 Dec 2009 at 2:44 pm

Its definitly changing with a lesser emphasis on the organic.

Mark Carter 16 Dec 2009 at 2:50 pm

It’s an interesting one, isn’t it? …. blended results really seems to divide opinion in the SEO community.

David Cohen - Companeo UK & leads 07 Jan 2010 at 4:14 pm

Yahoo was a Search Engine master in past,
it was….before it reduced organic results strongly.
Google didn’t forget it.

Anyway,
results about pictures or videos or news or blogs remain organic results for me, blended but organic indeed.
Some SEO didn’t forget it.
I worked on keywords in text only, now I work on keywords around pictures or videos too.

David

{ 4 trackbacks }

Google Local citation & review data study
12.01.09 at 1:51 pm
Solo el 21% de los resultados de Google son orgánicos
12.01.09 at 5:39 pm
Twitter Results to feature in main SERPS’s | redsauce.com
12.03.09 at 2:59 pm
SOS Weekly Recap in Search 11/30/09 | StayOnSearch
12.04.09 at 6:05 pm

Leave a Comment (registration is optional)

Registration is free, takes about 5 seconds and is worth doing.

You can use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href=""> <b> <blockquote> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>