Organic results only make up 21% of Googles search result pages

by Patrick Altoft on / 25 responses

Over the last few months Google has been really pushing local search in the UK (with plans to push it even more) and we are finding Local Business Results increasingly creeping into generic keywords such as mobile phones.

Today I thought it would be interesting to take the “mobile phones” search results and see what percentage of the page each element takes up. The results are below and you can click on the screenshot to see a full size version of the whole page.

The top 10 organic results now only account for 21% of the page with local listings taking up 9.3% – almost the same as the Adwords ads which take up 14.3%. Just under 50% of the page is either white space or navigation links.

Google area figures

Google results

Page real estate

Patrick Altoft is Director of Search at Branded3, a Leeds SEO & Digital Agency specialising in SEO, Web Design, Development & Social Media.

Get daily posts direct to your inbox

You can get our blog posts delivered for free by email every day - simply add your email address to the box above, or alternatively you can grab the RSS feed.

Comments

Read the 21 comments below, or add your own!

November 30, 2009 at 6:15pm

Great post. It’s funny – Google wants us to help them make their search engine better – why don’t they just give us back the old organic listings?

Hope Bing is taking note…..

Reply

November 30, 2009 at 7:11pm

Shaun I think we have to assume people click on the local results, otherwise Google wouldn’t show them.

Reply

November 30, 2009 at 6:16pm

Nice idea for a study.
However, did you not take into consideration the 7 other natural results that are under the local ones in your screenshot? that would be more like 65% if you did… Maybe i’m missing something, in which case shame on me etc etc.

Reply

November 30, 2009 at 6:36pm

Eloi the 7 natural listings below the organic results are taken into account in the figures. I just didn’t give them a label.

Reply

November 30, 2009 at 6:57pm

Having recently switched to a new laptop I thought things were a bit crowded in Google results but hadn’t realised it was this bad! Thank heavens for the CustomizeGoogle Firefox plugin. Seems G are heading for the same old AltaVista scenario that got them their start in the first place. Bring back simple search!

Reply

November 30, 2009 at 7:43pm

Patrick true – I’ve often wondered if one random local result at a time would be better tho instead of a big list (that in a lot of cases aren’t even that local).

Reply

November 30, 2009 at 8:27pm

I have been using the search term motorcycle to show this phenomenon lately. Tons of news results, images, local, etc.

Reply

December 1, 2009 at 12:14am

Very interesting post. It depends on the industry/vertical as to how much Google is willing to spread the % across multiple elements. Verticals that have significant SEM spend such as travel, finance are less likely to see an increase in video, news, images etc.. into the SERPs. However move away from the Head verticals & the landscape is looking far more experimental & like what Patrick has displayed above.

It’s a changing landscape. I like the motorcycles example. I find the phrase Surfing to also be a good example of the changing Google Search results.

Reply

December 1, 2009 at 7:18am

In the 21.0%, what is the percentage of clicks at the first position, second, third , fourth and fifth positions. Please let me know if there is any analysis.

Reply

patrenet
December 1, 2009 at 9:51am

Le référencement naturel représentent 21% des résultats de recherche Google
http://patrenet.com/Le-referencement-naturel-representent-21-des-resultats-de-recherche-Google.html

Reply

December 1, 2009 at 12:09pm

Great post, I found those statistics very interesting.
Thanks

Reply

December 1, 2009 at 2:08pm

Googles really forgot natural results… IMO gg is far from its best results with all those tricks now.

Reply

December 1, 2009 at 2:25pm

Thanks for the post and for sharing the info on Google organic search and its results.

Reply

December 1, 2009 at 3:04pm

How can we be sure that our business will be showed on the map?
What we have to do? I figured that Google is using country related yellow pages and then sorts out businesses by the cities and industry.

Reply

December 9, 2009 at 2:44pm

Its definitly changing with a lesser emphasis on the organic.

Reply

December 16, 2009 at 2:50pm

It’s an interesting one, isn’t it? …. blended results really seems to divide opinion in the SEO community.

Reply

January 7, 2010 at 4:14pm

Yahoo was a Search Engine master in past,
it was….before it reduced organic results strongly.
Google didn’t forget it.

Anyway,
results about pictures or videos or news or blogs remain organic results for me, blended but organic indeed.
Some SEO didn’t forget it.
I worked on keywords in text only, now I work on keywords around pictures or videos too.

David

Reply

September 13, 2011 at 1:36pm

curious if you have monitored this study since 2009? surely quite interesting to see how big that Local wedge has grown & further decline for the organic %

Reply

September 30, 2011 at 5:34pm

I’d be interested in seeing an update to this with local factored in?

Reply

October 18, 2011 at 12:16pm

Lately organic results are being pushed down even further with the introduction of huge sitelinks in Adwords ads and the half a page sitelinks given to some organic sites that hold #1. I would love to get a glimpse of the SERPS in 5 years from now.

Reply

January 16, 2012 at 2:43pm

I also would love to see an update to this peice. Things have changes a bit since this was posted. Great original post though!

Reply

4 trackbacks

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Fields marked with an asterisk are required.
 

  *

  *

You can use one of the following tags:
<a href=""><blockquote><code><em><strike><strong>