Microsoft to power Yahoo search

by Patrick Altoft on July 29, 2009

Microsoft and Yahoo are joining forces in an effort to compete with Google in the search wars. Yahoo algorithmic results will be powered by the Microsoft / Bing algorithm and the paid results will be powered by AdCenter.

The announcement is good news because it’s clear that the two companies can’t compete with Google by themselves. I doubt it will make much difference in the UK because Yahoo has a very small market share as shown in the Hitwise data below.
Search market share

The only drawback is that rollout is expected within 24 months following regulatory approval by which time Twitter or Facebook will probably have more search volume.

  • Microsoft will acquire an exclusive 10 year license to Yahoo!’s core search technologies, and Microsoft will have the ability to integrate Yahoo! search technologies into its existing web search platforms;
  • Microsoft’s Bing will be the exclusive algorithmic search and paid search platform for Yahoo! sites. Yahoo! will continue to use its technology and data in other areas of its business such as enhancing display advertising technology.
  • Yahoo! will become the exclusive worldwide relationship sales force for both companies’ premium search advertisers. Self-serve advertising for both companies will be fulfilled by Microsoft’s AdCenter platform, and prices for all search ads will continue to be set by AdCenter’s automated auction process.
  • Each company will maintain its own separate display advertising business and sales force.
  • Yahoo! will innovate and “own” the user experience on Yahoo! properties, including the user experience for search, even though it will be powered by Microsoft technology.
  • Microsoft will compensate Yahoo! through a revenue sharing agreement on traffic generated on Yahoo!’s network of both owned and operated (O&O) and affiliate sites.
  • Microsoft will pay traffic acquisition costs (TAC) to Yahoo! at an initial rate of 88% of search revenue generated on Yahoo!’s O&O sites during the first 5 years of the agreement.
  • Yahoo! will continue to syndicate its existing search affiliate partnerships.
  • Microsoft will guarantee Yahoo!’s O&O revenue per search (RPS) in each country for the first 18 months following initial implementation in that country.
  • At full implementation (expected to occur within 24 months following regulatory approval), Yahoo! estimates, based on current levels of revenue and current operating expenses, that this agreement will provide a benefit to annual GAAP operating income of approximately $500 million and capital expenditure savings of approximately $200 million. Yahoo! also estimates that this agreement will provide a benefit to annual operating cash flow of approximately $275 million.
  • The agreement protects consumer privacy by limiting the data shared between the companies to the minimum necessary to operate and improve the combined search platform, and restricts the use of search data shared between the companies. The agreement maintains the industry-leading privacy practices that each company follows today.
Patrick Altoft is Director of Search at Leeds based digital & SEO agency Branded3. Patrick also runs Blogstorm.

You can get our blog posts delivered for free by email every day - simply add your email address to the box below or alternatively grab the RSS feed.

Read some similar posts

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

{ 15 comments… read them below or add one }

mengliang 29 Jul 2009 at 1:06 pm
Find me on Facebook | Twitter

We are doing most of our search marketing on Yahoo! Panama. However the time period before which they would roll out AdCenter to replace Pamana might be considerable and I am not sure if they will stop innovating on that area. A cause of concern for us. Not sure what will happen to their much fabled desktop Yahoo! Search Engine marketing program now that it is semi official. hmm….

More comments from mengliang
Jonathan Stewart 29 Jul 2009 at 1:13 pm

You seen mention mention about what might happen to SiteExplorer. Would be bad to lose access to that as a result of this

dan 29 Jul 2009 at 1:15 pm
Find me on Facebook | Twitter

How would, or could, Twitter or Facebook have more search volume in two years than Microsoft and Yahoo! combined?

I mean, for one, Facebook doesn’t appear to have plans to enter into search (and it would be hugely foolish – they’re a communication platform) – but doesn’t Facebook also have a deal with Microsoft to use Microsoft’s technology for Facebook’s internal search anyway?

Twitter search seems equally unlikely to stand a chance, as they’ve yet to enter the market, their audience is tiny, and the whole concept of tweet-powered search ranking seems ridiculous and useless anyway.

More comments from dan
Phil Green 29 Jul 2009 at 1:16 pm
Find me on Twitter

From a purely selfish point of view I am happy with this – I own many exact match domain names and they are all ranking better in Bing than Yahoo. If this deal moves my good rankings into Yahoo Search also, its more £ for me :D

More comments from Phil Green
Patrick Altoft 29 Jul 2009 at 2:02 pm
Find me on Twitter

Dan 2 years is a long time and while it might seem far fetched now with Twitter launching a new homepage today with search the main feature it’s fair to assume they might do something major.

More comments from Patrick Altoft
Paid Survey Sites 29 Jul 2009 at 2:31 pm
Find me on Facebook | Twitter

Microsoft is really trying to give Google a run for its money. While I don’t see Bing as competition for google at the moment, it would be nice to see what new features Bing brings to the table to compete.

More comments from Paid Survey Sites
Branko Zecevic 29 Jul 2009 at 3:13 pm
Find me on Twitter

Hi Patrick!
It is always nice to see some competition!
This will lead to constant improvement in both giants.Google is more popular and stronger,that’s a fact. But nobody knows what will be in near future.

More comments from Branko Zecevic
Luci 29 Jul 2009 at 5:19 pm
Find me on Twitter

i think microsoft+yahoo can try to compete with Google, but google just own the market. It’d take a considerable upping in efforts from the combined party to really make a dent .

as for facebook and twitter becoming MAJOR search players in the next couple of years… i don’t think so. Not in terms of serious competition – they’re not on the scene at all now!

More comments from Luci
SEO-Doctor 30 Jul 2009 at 10:52 am

@Phil – I too have great success with exact match domains with Bing and Yahoo, but there will probably be big changes in the algo 24months down the line.

I still think it will make life better for everyone (escpecially SEOs) when we don’t have to be at Google’s mercy.

More comments from SEO-Doctor
Victor Fomin 31 Jul 2009 at 4:25 am

I am sure I will join them too late, too far left Google on all fronts of them.

More comments from Victor Fomin
jbradder 02 Aug 2009 at 2:37 pm
Find me on Twitter

I’m sure that it’s time for some fundamental changes in search. Google have had it too long. Google now means to search just as Hoover came to mean vacuuming. But will this collaboration be Google’s Dyson?

More comments from jbradder
SmartPark 04 Aug 2009 at 10:16 am

As mentioned earlier, hope we don’t lose siteexplorer…..

More comments from SmartPark
Tag44 04 Aug 2009 at 1:19 pm

Thanks for the info and for sharing the resourceful info with us.

Stagingworks 05 Aug 2009 at 2:34 pm

Google will be that easy to topple from its current position. Yahoo and Microsoft collaboration will not make a significant change over the existing trend of Google Fever’. Believe me!. From Vacant Home Staging

judyrom 07 Aug 2009 at 5:36 pm

Are Microsoft and Yahoo strong enough together to challenge Google’s overwhelming market share?

More comments from judyrom

Leave a Comment (registration is optional)

Registration is free, takes about 5 seconds and is worth doing.

You can use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href=""> <b> <blockquote> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>