<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to maximise your StumbleUpon traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/maximise-stumbleupon-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/maximise-stumbleupon-traffic/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 101 Links that will Help you to Drive more Traffic to your Blog&#160;&#124;&#160;Blogging for Cash</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/maximise-stumbleupon-traffic/#comment-203101</link>
		<dc:creator>101 Links that will Help you to Drive more Traffic to your Blog&#160;&#124;&#160;Blogging for Cash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/maximise-stumbleupon-traffic/#comment-203101</guid>
		<description>[...] How to maximise your StumbleUpon traffic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How to maximise your StumbleUpon traffic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vidar</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/maximise-stumbleupon-traffic/#comment-3197</link>
		<dc:creator>Vidar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/maximise-stumbleupon-traffic/#comment-3197</guid>
		<description>I did come upon this via Stumbleupon, and in this case it was the big &quot;How to maximise your StumbleUpon traffic&quot; that kept me from moving on. A lot of the time I do just move on, and I do admit I rarely leave comment. But even a few percent who do will make a difference.

Personally I halfway use Stumbleupon as my &quot;bookmarks&quot;, and I do often come back later.

It may also be worthwhile for the occasional added backlink (I recently put an RSS feed on my homepage at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hokstad.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hokstad.com&lt;/a&gt; of my recent &quot;thumbs up&quot; stumbles, for example.

The first two paragraph of this article does hit the nail on the head, though: Far too few sites make their value proposition clear at the top of the page. That doesn&#039;t matter much when dealing with your &quot;normal&quot; users that know what you&#039;re about, but it matters for a new user that comes to your site without knowing what to expect. In the case of StumbleUpon that applies EVERY time, and so if it&#039;s not blatantly obvious in a second or so I&#039;ll move on.

But as the post says: Performance is also vital. I won&#039;t wait long for a page to load. Again because I don&#039;t know what value it&#039;ll have, and most aren&#039;t worth the wait, so I&#039;d rather take my chances with the next page.

Think of writing for StumbleUpon and other &quot;random&quot; traffic sources as writing for a tabloid newspaper: You have a couple of seconds to get the attention of your public before you lose them. You need to both be able to deliver the page and show them why they should stay in that short amount of time.

The good side is that focusing your writing on that will be a benefit to you when dealing with &quot;normal&quot; readers too, who&#039;ll otherwise just move on to the next item in their feed reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did come upon this via Stumbleupon, and in this case it was the big &#8220;How to maximise your StumbleUpon traffic&#8221; that kept me from moving on. A lot of the time I do just move on, and I do admit I rarely leave comment. But even a few percent who do will make a difference.</p>
<p>Personally I halfway use Stumbleupon as my &#8220;bookmarks&#8221;, and I do often come back later.</p>
<p>It may also be worthwhile for the occasional added backlink (I recently put an RSS feed on my homepage at <a href="http://www.hokstad.com/" rel="nofollow">hokstad.com</a> of my recent &#8220;thumbs up&#8221; stumbles, for example.</p>
<p>The first two paragraph of this article does hit the nail on the head, though: Far too few sites make their value proposition clear at the top of the page. That doesn&#8217;t matter much when dealing with your &#8220;normal&#8221; users that know what you&#8217;re about, but it matters for a new user that comes to your site without knowing what to expect. In the case of StumbleUpon that applies EVERY time, and so if it&#8217;s not blatantly obvious in a second or so I&#8217;ll move on.</p>
<p>But as the post says: Performance is also vital. I won&#8217;t wait long for a page to load. Again because I don&#8217;t know what value it&#8217;ll have, and most aren&#8217;t worth the wait, so I&#8217;d rather take my chances with the next page.</p>
<p>Think of writing for StumbleUpon and other &#8220;random&#8221; traffic sources as writing for a tabloid newspaper: You have a couple of seconds to get the attention of your public before you lose them. You need to both be able to deliver the page and show them why they should stay in that short amount of time.</p>
<p>The good side is that focusing your writing on that will be a benefit to you when dealing with &#8220;normal&#8221; readers too, who&#8217;ll otherwise just move on to the next item in their feed reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pelf</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/maximise-stumbleupon-traffic/#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator>pelf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/maximise-stumbleupon-traffic/#comment-1094</guid>
		<description>The thing is, even if your blog loads very quickly, most stumblers either:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(a) rate a post/page, OR&lt;br /&gt;
(b) stumble the next post/page&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and they do not normally take time to drop a comment or two. People would say that they use SU to &quot;find great content&quot;, but when they&#039;ve found it, they just give it a &quot;thumb&#039;s up&quot; and then proceed to stumble the next page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which brings us back to square one: Who will benefit from all these stumbling? Definitely not the bloggers because what good would it do to bloggers if visitors merely &quot;pass by&quot; their posts/pages without leaving a comment, or subscribing to the blog?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So to all stumblers, if you stumbled upon a post/page you like, why not leave the blogger a comment? I&#039;m sure it would make everybody&#039;s experience better &lt;img src=&quot;http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/images/icon_smile.gif&quot; alt=&quot;Smile&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is, even if your blog loads very quickly, most stumblers either:</p>
<p>(a) rate a post/page, OR<br />
(b) stumble the next post/page</p>
<p>and they do not normally take time to drop a comment or two. People would say that they use SU to &#8220;find great content&#8221;, but when they&#8217;ve found it, they just give it a &#8220;thumb&#8217;s up&#8221; and then proceed to stumble the next page.</p>
<p>Which brings us back to square one: Who will benefit from all these stumbling? Definitely not the bloggers because what good would it do to bloggers if visitors merely &#8220;pass by&#8221; their posts/pages without leaving a comment, or subscribing to the blog?</p>
<p>So to all stumblers, if you stumbled upon a post/page you like, why not leave the blogger a comment? I&#8217;m sure it would make everybody&#8217;s experience better <img src="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/images/icon_smile.gif" alt="Smile"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/maximise-stumbleupon-traffic/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/maximise-stumbleupon-traffic/#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>and if your website is too slow, get Patrick to give up the script he wrote that runs his site!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and if your website is too slow, get Patrick to give up the script he wrote that runs his site!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uzair</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/maximise-stumbleupon-traffic/#comment-1024</link>
		<dc:creator>Uzair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/maximise-stumbleupon-traffic/#comment-1024</guid>
		<description>I think the best trick to get more stumble is to review other stumblers and their submitted pages. This way they are compelled to stumble your pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the best trick to get more stumble is to review other stumblers and their submitted pages. This way they are compelled to stumble your pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

