<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Google look stupid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/make-google-look-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/make-google-look-stupid/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Klein</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/make-google-look-stupid/#comment-1957</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/make-google-look-stupid/#comment-1957</guid>
		<description>Well ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have observed quite many other business sites which are targeting a very similar market and audience as I do in the past. I am always astonished how these websites have managed to get top results on the SERPs on Google.com within a very short period of time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Especially when you have a look at the (poor) quality of inbound links. (The term fits very well on my opinion &quot;Quantity is not quality&quot;.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Right now, I am also questioning &quot;Google&#039;s Golden Webmaster Guidelines &amp; Rules&quot;. Maybe Mr. Matt Cutts could explain to me these rules and suggestions once again in clear words since I have great difficulties at the moment to get the real point out of their &quot;Golden Webmaster Rules&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have the slight impression that no matter how hard Webmasters are trying to do things right (in terms of SEO in an ethical sense), in the end, it is up to the Search Engine Master Google.com himself to decide IF, WHEN, and HOW MUCH money you are allowed to make on the web.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
graphically &amp; sincerely,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marc Klein</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8230;</p>
<p>I have observed quite many other business sites which are targeting a very similar market and audience as I do in the past. I am always astonished how these websites have managed to get top results on the SERPs on Google.com within a very short period of time.</p>
<p>Especially when you have a look at the (poor) quality of inbound links. (The term fits very well on my opinion &#8220;Quantity is not quality&#8221;.)</p>
<p>Right now, I am also questioning &#8220;Google&#8217;s Golden Webmaster Guidelines &#038; Rules&#8221;. Maybe Mr. Matt Cutts could explain to me these rules and suggestions once again in clear words since I have great difficulties at the moment to get the real point out of their &#8220;Golden Webmaster Rules&#8221;.</p>
<p>I have the slight impression that no matter how hard Webmasters are trying to do things right (in terms of SEO in an ethical sense), in the end, it is up to the Search Engine Master Google.com himself to decide IF, WHEN, and HOW MUCH money you are allowed to make on the web.</p>
<p>graphically &#038; sincerely,</p>
<p>Marc Klein</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Steele</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/make-google-look-stupid/#comment-1296</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/make-google-look-stupid/#comment-1296</guid>
		<description>Excellent point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What&#039;s worse is when a site that steals content from Wikipedia and creative commons blogs reaches the top. I really wish Google would just put a friggin &quot;Report Spam&quot; link next to each result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s worse is when a site that steals content from Wikipedia and creative commons blogs reaches the top. I really wish Google would just put a friggin &#8220;Report Spam&#8221; link next to each result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

