Comments on: 4 Image search engines compared http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/image-search-compared/ Internet marketing and search engine optimisation Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: bestoptimized http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/image-search-compared/#comment-649 bestoptimized Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:48:32 +0000 http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/image-search-compared/#comment-649 Why didn't you compare Live.com's image search? I think they may have the best. Why didn’t you compare Live.com’s image search? I think they may have the best.

]]> By: John King http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/image-search-compared/#comment-551 John King Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:10:13 +0000 http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/image-search-compared/#comment-551 Recently anytime I've needed to search for pictures I've been used live image search. The results are almost always better, and their interface is very intuitive. I might checkout ask image search next time I'm looking. Recently anytime I’ve needed to search for pictures I’ve been used live image search. The results are almost always better, and their interface is very intuitive. I might checkout ask image search next time I’m looking.

]]> By: Uzair http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/image-search-compared/#comment-532 Uzair Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:24:15 +0000 http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/image-search-compared/#comment-532 Google is always the king of search, may it be images or any other thing. Google is always the king of search, may it be images or any other thing.

]]> By: Matt Cutts http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/image-search-compared/#comment-531 Matt Cutts Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:08:57 +0000 http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/image-search-compared/#comment-531 If I recall correctly, users typically don't like getting tiny button/navigational images, so I think Google might do some extra work to exclude things like buttons that a lot of users consider less helpful. I'd guess that's probably the reason for the last couple of queries.<br /> <br /> It was fun that you picked me as an example query. ;) If I recall correctly, users typically don’t like getting tiny button/navigational images, so I think Google might do some extra work to exclude things like buttons that a lot of users consider less helpful. I’d guess that’s probably the reason for the last couple of queries.

It was fun that you picked me as an example query. ;)

]]> By: Ramkarthik http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/image-search-compared/#comment-524 Ramkarthik Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:43:24 +0000 http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/image-search-compared/#comment-524 Oh I thought Flickr would have god some weird results for the last two also. Stumbled! this good analysis. Oh I thought Flickr would have god some weird results for the last two also. Stumbled! this good analysis.

]]> By: Patrick Altoft http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/image-search-compared/#comment-523 Patrick Altoft Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:35:04 +0000 http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/image-search-compared/#comment-523 Flickr returned zero results for the last 2 queries so I didn't mention them. Flickr returned zero results for the last 2 queries so I didn’t mention them.

]]> By: Ramkarthik http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/image-search-compared/#comment-522 Ramkarthik Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:01:53 +0000 http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/image-search-compared/#comment-522 Ask.com produced good results for those buttons but for normal search Google presents better results. And why was there no image from Flickr for the last two queries? But anyway good analysis. Ask.com produced good results for those buttons but for normal search Google presents better results. And why was there no image from Flickr for the last two queries? But anyway good analysis.

]]>