<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to handle Googlebot during site downtime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/handle-googlebot-during-site-downtime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/handle-googlebot-during-site-downtime/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/handle-googlebot-during-site-downtime/#comment-288731</link>
		<dc:creator>stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/handle-googlebot-during-site-downtime/#comment-288731</guid>
		<description>I have changed soon my server, and the site was down for few hours and 2-3 day the site speed was low.And now everything is ok with the site is online with good speed loading. BUT the traffic is down with 1k.

I dont know why</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have changed soon my server, and the site was down for few hours and 2-3 day the site speed was low.And now everything is ok with the site is online with good speed loading. BUT the traffic is down with 1k.</p>
<p>I dont know why</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to manage the website of a company in administration</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/handle-googlebot-during-site-downtime/#comment-101887</link>
		<dc:creator>How to manage the website of a company in administration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/handle-googlebot-during-site-downtime/#comment-101887</guid>
		<description>[...] 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable HTTP status code in the same way as you would if your site was undergoing temporary downtime. The example below tells Googlebot to retry after a week.  &lt;?php header(&quot;HTTP/1.1 503 Service [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable HTTP status code in the same way as you would if your site was undergoing temporary downtime. The example below tells Googlebot to retry after a week.  &lt;?php header(&#8220;HTTP/1.1 503 Service [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/handle-googlebot-during-site-downtime/#comment-4546</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/handle-googlebot-during-site-downtime/#comment-4546</guid>
		<description>I have always used the rewrite rule and holding page trick but it has never occurred to me to use a 503 header to &lt;b&gt;really&lt;/b&gt; send the right message.

Apache will also send a 503 response when it reaches max_clients.  It&#039;s good to know that this won&#039;t affect Google.

I&#039;ve always wanted to use 410 Gone but I have never found the right time to use it.  If I ever move content then I know where it is and send a 301 response... I don&#039;t ever just delete something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always used the rewrite rule and holding page trick but it has never occurred to me to use a 503 header to <b>really</b> send the right message.</p>
<p>Apache will also send a 503 response when it reaches max_clients.  It&#8217;s good to know that this won&#8217;t affect Google.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always wanted to use 410 Gone but I have never found the right time to use it.  If I ever move content then I know where it is and send a 301 response&#8230; I don&#8217;t ever just delete something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FileGets</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/handle-googlebot-during-site-downtime/#comment-1552</link>
		<dc:creator>FileGets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/handle-googlebot-during-site-downtime/#comment-1552</guid>
		<description>Nice tip! Very nice! I&#039;ll save it.&lt;br /&gt;
But unfortunately this can&#039;t solve problem then your host goes down and you can&#039;t access it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice tip! Very nice! I&#8217;ll save it.<br />
But unfortunately this can&#8217;t solve problem then your host goes down and you can&#8217;t access it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/handle-googlebot-during-site-downtime/#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/handle-googlebot-during-site-downtime/#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>Nice tip. So many websites return the wrong HTTP codes, especially when the pages are generated through a CMS. 503 is definitely much better than 404 --- it says &quot;come back later&quot; rather than screaming &quot;ERROR!!! BAD LINK!!!&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not just good for Google, it&#039;s good for visitors too, especially if you&#039;ve written a decent explanation in the errorpage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice tip. So many websites return the wrong HTTP codes, especially when the pages are generated through a CMS. 503 is definitely much better than 404 &#8212; it says &#8220;come back later&#8221; rather than screaming &#8220;ERROR!!! BAD LINK!!!&#8221;.</p>
<p>This is not just good for Google, it&#8217;s good for visitors too, especially if you&#8217;ve written a decent explanation in the errorpage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/handle-googlebot-during-site-downtime/#comment-1491</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/handle-googlebot-during-site-downtime/#comment-1491</guid>
		<description>Nice tip here. Thanks a lot. I had never thought about doing individual page downtime messages programatically. Nice work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice tip here. Thanks a lot. I had never thought about doing individual page downtime messages programatically. Nice work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

