Updated: Google takes strong action on Money.co.uk fake linkbait article

by Patrick Altoft on / 14 responses

Most of you probably heard about a certain article published on Money.co.uk recently. Matt Cutts from Google promised to take action and it seems like this action has now been taken.

The article remains in the Google index but no longer ranks for it’s own name. In fact the site doesn’t even rank for it’s title tag anymore!

My guess is that Google has applied a filter to ignore all the links pointing to the fake story and has added a penalty to the site.

My opinion is that if you want to make up some fake linkbait you need to make sure that Google (or anybody else) doesn’t find out it’s fake.

Matts comments:

Matt says they don’t want to be the “truth” police. Matt says it was different than a prank like April Fools. It was more deceptive than that as it had no disclosure that it was fake. Matt looks at it then as more intentional than accidental.

Matt says to not take any action on a story that is fake like that one was would be irresponsible. He sees it as an attempt to get links even if you have to “lie” about it and feels that is just wrong. In reality, it was a move to protect Google users from lies and deception.

Patrick Altoft is Director of Search at Branded3, a Leeds SEO & Digital Agency specialising in SEO, Web Design, Development & Social Media.

Get daily posts direct to your inbox

You can get our blog posts delivered for free by email every day - simply add your email address to the box above, or alternatively you can grab the RSS feed.

Comments

Read the 9 comments below, or add your own!

June 4, 2008 at 10:35am

Also money.co.uk home page is down to #18 from #5 last week for “money” (without quotes) in Google.co.uk

Reply

June 4, 2008 at 10:47am

Interesting. I hadn’t looked at any previous rankings so couldn’t do a comparison.

Reply

June 4, 2008 at 11:26am

I checked to make sure I can see a potential penalty :-)

Reply

June 4, 2008 at 3:28pm

“In fact the site doesn’t even rank for it’s title tag anymore!”

It’s number 6.

Reply

June 4, 2008 at 4:06pm

Number 6 when you add quotes, nowhere without them. It still smacks of a penalty to me.

Reply

June 4, 2008 at 7:35pm

Interesting find Patrick – and certainly it was a @ -50 when I checked, and I’m tracking some sites with what would appear to be the same ‘penalty’ / shady zone if that is the case.

Glitch or Algo or hand tweak – could be any number of reasons

Reply

June 4, 2008 at 7:37pm

Also when I checked a few weeks ago for money.co.uk in Google, the 13 year old article was the indented listing after the home page.

Not there now.

Reply

July 31, 2008 at 2:30am

I don’t like the shady practices that money.co.uk has been up to lately. There is a lot more than just this article.

Reply

February 18, 2010 at 11:12pm

It’s all fair! Inlinks shouldn’t be misused.

All the best,
Magnus Lundin – Sweden

Reply

5 trackbacks

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Fields marked with an asterisk are required.
 

  *

  *

You can use one of the following tags:
<a href=""><blockquote><code><em><strike><strong>