Search engine optimisation from Blogstorm

Updated: Google takes strong action on Money.co.uk fake linkbait article

by Patrick Altoft on June 4, 2008

Most of you probably heard about a certain article published on Money.co.uk recently. Matt Cutts from Google promised to take action and it seems like this action has now been taken.

The article remains in the Google index but no longer ranks for it’s own name. In fact the site doesn’t even rank for it’s title tag anymore!

My guess is that Google has applied a filter to ignore all the links pointing to the fake story and has added a penalty to the site.

My opinion is that if you want to make up some fake linkbait you need to make sure that Google (or anybody else) doesn’t find out it’s fake.

Matts comments:

Matt says they don’t want to be the “truth” police. Matt says it was different than a prank like April Fools. It was more deceptive than that as it had no disclosure that it was fake. Matt looks at it then as more intentional than accidental.

Matt says to not take any action on a story that is fake like that one was would be irresponsible. He sees it as an attempt to get links even if you have to “lie” about it and feels that is just wrong. In reality, it was a move to protect Google users from lies and deception.

You can get our blog posts delivered for free by email every day - simply add your email address to the box below or alternatively grab the RSS feed.

Read some similar posts

Published in: Google delicious | digg | reddit | StumbleUpon | Google Bookmarks | Sphinn

{ 3 trackbacks }

Google se pone duro: Penaliza historias falsas
06.04.08 at 12:32 pm
Is Your Website a Google Athlete? | The PlanetDomain Blog
06.16.08 at 8:37 am
Horizons - Mezzanine Consulting
06.26.08 at 2:14 pm

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Tad Chef 04/06/2008 at 10:35 am

Also money.co.uk home page is down to #18 from #5 last week for “money” (without quotes) in Google.co.uk

2 Patrick Altoft 04/06/2008 at 10:47 am

Interesting. I hadn’t looked at any previous rankings so couldn’t do a comparison.

3 Tad Chef 04/06/2008 at 11:26 am

I checked to make sure I can see a potential penalty :-)

4 David Fiske 04/06/2008 at 3:28 pm

“In fact the site doesn’t even rank for it’s title tag anymore!”

It’s number 6.

5 Patrick Altoft 04/06/2008 at 4:06 pm

Number 6 when you add quotes, nowhere without them. It still smacks of a penalty to me.

6 Hobo 04/06/2008 at 7:35 pm

Interesting find Patrick - and certainly it was a @ -50 when I checked, and I’m tracking some sites with what would appear to be the same ‘penalty’ / shady zone if that is the case.

Glitch or Algo or hand tweak - could be any number of reasons

7 Hobo 04/06/2008 at 7:37 pm

Also when I checked a few weeks ago for money.co.uk in Google, the 13 year old article was the indented listing after the home page.

Not there now.

8 wisdom 31/07/2008 at 2:30 am

I don’t like the shady practices that money.co.uk has been up to lately. There is a lot more than just this article.

Leave a Comment (get an avatar from Gravatar first)

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>