<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google stops passing anchor text through certain 301 redirects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-stops-passing-anchor-text-through-certain-301-redirects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-stops-passing-anchor-text-through-certain-301-redirects/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjørn</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-stops-passing-anchor-text-through-certain-301-redirects/#comment-552413</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjørn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1831#comment-552413</guid>
		<description>Thanks for bringing this up.

Many regards from sweden</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for bringing this up.</p>
<p>Many regards from sweden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: intoto</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-stops-passing-anchor-text-through-certain-301-redirects/#comment-490532</link>
		<dc:creator>intoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1831#comment-490532</guid>
		<description>Well from a customer point of view it makes perfect sense, that Google doesn’t pass the “anchor text value” if you delete a page and 301 to the homepage. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s good SEO to just 301 to the homepage, it should be to a page that offer content close to the deleted page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well from a customer point of view it makes perfect sense, that Google doesn’t pass the “anchor text value” if you delete a page and 301 to the homepage. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s good SEO to just 301 to the homepage, it should be to a page that offer content close to the deleted page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george brown</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-stops-passing-anchor-text-through-certain-301-redirects/#comment-487506</link>
		<dc:creator>george brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1831#comment-487506</guid>
		<description>I guess the simple answer is to redirect to the nearest relevant page when you take another page down. i can hardly blame google for using logic like this at all though...... makes a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the simple answer is to redirect to the nearest relevant page when you take another page down. i can hardly blame google for using logic like this at all though&#8230;&#8230; makes a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Sniper Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-stops-passing-anchor-text-through-certain-301-redirects/#comment-447168</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Sniper Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 20:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1831#comment-447168</guid>
		<description>What are we suppose to do now for redirects to include our anchor text?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are we suppose to do now for redirects to include our anchor text?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stock Assault</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-stops-passing-anchor-text-through-certain-301-redirects/#comment-392487</link>
		<dc:creator>Stock Assault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 10:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1831#comment-392487</guid>
		<description>Hello,

Really great post you have written here.
I didn&#039;t know about that.
Ehh, now Google is smarter...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Really great post you have written here.<br />
I didn&#8217;t know about that.<br />
Ehh, now Google is smarter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deadbeat Millionaire</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-stops-passing-anchor-text-through-certain-301-redirects/#comment-389413</link>
		<dc:creator>Deadbeat Millionaire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 09:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1831#comment-389413</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very useful to learn how Google looks at the things all the time in search engine marketing. Now I&#039;ve got more knowledge about 301 redirect...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very useful to learn how Google looks at the things all the time in search engine marketing. Now I&#8217;ve got more knowledge about 301 redirect&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-stops-passing-anchor-text-through-certain-301-redirects/#comment-375834</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1831#comment-375834</guid>
		<description>Excellent article you have written Patrick. It&#039;s well researched and very informative. I agree with the others who have said that Google knows best in this case. I agree with the policy as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article you have written Patrick. It&#8217;s well researched and very informative. I agree with the others who have said that Google knows best in this case. I agree with the policy as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Sniper</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-stops-passing-anchor-text-through-certain-301-redirects/#comment-373987</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Sniper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 10:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1831#comment-373987</guid>
		<description>Patrick is there any other method to do a redirect now and gain trust in Google eyes?
You really done a great job with this article...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick is there any other method to do a redirect now and gain trust in Google eyes?<br />
You really done a great job with this article&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 301 Redirects Can Pass Anchor Text</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-stops-passing-anchor-text-through-certain-301-redirects/#comment-314612</link>
		<dc:creator>301 Redirects Can Pass Anchor Text</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1831#comment-314612</guid>
		<description>[...] of the questions we often receive and has been discussed quite a bit is whether 301 redirects actually pass on any anchor text. This is an important question, as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the questions we often receive and has been discussed quite a bit is whether 301 redirects actually pass on any anchor text. This is an important question, as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick cash Concepts</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-stops-passing-anchor-text-through-certain-301-redirects/#comment-276263</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick cash Concepts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1831#comment-276263</guid>
		<description>As always Google is smarter than we think. I fully agree with Googles policy on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always Google is smarter than we think. I fully agree with Googles policy on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

