Comments on: Google Search Result Lockdown

By: Amit

Amit — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:58:37 +0000

that is a really interesting theory that you have come with Patrick. I see the same with some of my sites also.

By: Radu - ecommy.com

Radu - ecommy.com — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:30:15 +0000

Really interesting article. This is a big problem that I noticed too. The cache is a good explanation and I think the cache refresh time is a lot wider for the first pages (cache depends on how often that data is requested – so if the system load is higher for certain pages (usually the first 2-3, they cache the results for some time (months))).

By: connor

connor — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:01:32 +0000

it s always givin me viruses

By: dymphnaboholt

dymphnaboholt — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 02:15:19 +0000

Tell me about it. Very Painful exercise, thus far clawing my way through the serps of dead (non fresh content) sites. Bouncing back and forth is painful.

By: Zoran

Zoran — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:54:23 +0000

This is true. I’ve got some site ranking on 6th position for main keyword and it took 5 months to go to 4th position. Pretty hard.

By: From Bishop

From Bishop — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:46:46 +0000

This is a really great find. It’s really weird that Google is doing these kind of things the only people have web sites and blogs care. That’s why Google doesn’t care what we really think. They know that people just searching for information will go to Google. So they don’t have to worry about what we think.

By: Paul

Paul — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:30:20 +0000

Surely that should be

normal ~~high quality~~ stable results.

By: Brian Chappell

Brian Chappell — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:28:08 +0000

Interesting find Patrick. Have noticed this for a while and wrote about it over on the fire horse.

http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Running-into-Googles-Great-Wall-of-SERP-defense.html