<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google patent granted: Rank adjustments via click data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-patent-granted-rank-adjustments-via-click-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-patent-granted-rank-adjustments-via-click-data/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:39:05 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The System</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-patent-granted-rank-adjustments-via-click-data/#comment-203433</link>
		<dc:creator>The System</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3247#comment-203433</guid>
		<description>You are all missing the main point. Google already has access to everybodies search behaviour and history. The data mining methods mentioned have already determined, using the law of large numbers and wisdom of crowds, a data set that can be trusted. It&#039;s not something anyone can game on a scale not to be noticed!
Google can then use this trusted dataset with it&#039;s other trusted datasets such as link popularity to produce a ranking score.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are all missing the main point. Google already has access to everybodies search behaviour and history. The data mining methods mentioned have already determined, using the law of large numbers and wisdom of crowds, a data set that can be trusted. It&#8217;s not something anyone can game on a scale not to be noticed!<br />
Google can then use this trusted dataset with it&#8217;s other trusted datasets such as link popularity to produce a ranking score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Search Posts Of The Week – 06/11/09 &#124; Fusion Unlimited Digital Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-patent-granted-rank-adjustments-via-click-data/#comment-192018</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Search Posts Of The Week – 06/11/09 &#124; Fusion Unlimited Digital Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3247#comment-192018</guid>
		<description>[...] 7 Google patent granted: Rank adjustments via click data [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 7 Google patent granted: Rank adjustments via click data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Boosting</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-patent-granted-rank-adjustments-via-click-data/#comment-190535</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Boosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3247#comment-190535</guid>
		<description>Hi, here is a Report how Google deals with Click-Fraud. 
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/pdf/Tuzhilin_Report.pdf   
There are 3-steps to prevent Ffraud and over 1.000 People at Google works on this topic. The rate of invalid clicks is described there as &lt; 0.02%.
 I think this paper is worth reading... ;-)
Mario</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, here is a Report how Google deals with Click-Fraud.<br />
<a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/pdf/Tuzhilin_Report.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://googleblog.blogspot.com/pdf/Tuzhilin_Report.pdf</a><br />
There are 3-steps to prevent Ffraud and over 1.000 People at Google works on this topic. The rate of invalid clicks is described there as &lt; 0.02%.<br />
 I think this paper is worth reading&#8230; <img src='http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Mario</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulB</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-patent-granted-rank-adjustments-via-click-data/#comment-190521</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3247#comment-190521</guid>
		<description>I agree that google probably is better than most at detecting click fraud, however there will be one crucial metric missing in serp clicks. When they work out PPC for an add on say adsense they can track if the user who clicked made a sale (if adwords buyer agrees) and this helps them work out visitor quality.

However with serp CTR they have no idea what happens after the click so would seem to me very hard to measure the quality/likelyhood that the request is a bot.

PaulB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that google probably is better than most at detecting click fraud, however there will be one crucial metric missing in serp clicks. When they work out PPC for an add on say adsense they can track if the user who clicked made a sale (if adwords buyer agrees) and this helps them work out visitor quality.</p>
<p>However with serp CTR they have no idea what happens after the click so would seem to me very hard to measure the quality/likelyhood that the request is a bot.</p>
<p>PaulB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-patent-granted-rank-adjustments-via-click-data/#comment-190498</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3247#comment-190498</guid>
		<description>Paul - while I agree with you that click fraud still happens, that report from theregister isn&#039;t solely about Google, its figures come from a range of ad networks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul &#8211; while I agree with you that click fraud still happens, that report from theregister isn&#8217;t solely about Google, its figures come from a range of ad networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tag44</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-patent-granted-rank-adjustments-via-click-data/#comment-190407</link>
		<dc:creator>tag44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3247#comment-190407</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post and for sharing the very resourceful information here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post and for sharing the very resourceful information here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulB</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-patent-granted-rank-adjustments-via-click-data/#comment-190306</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3247#comment-190306</guid>
		<description>Google is good at detecting click fraud? Not so sure : http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/23/botnet_generated_click_fraud/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is good at detecting click fraud? Not so sure : <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/23/botnet_generated_click_fraud/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/23/botnet_generated_click_fraud/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-patent-granted-rank-adjustments-via-click-data/#comment-190297</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3247#comment-190297</guid>
		<description>User data would be a lot harder to game - don&#039;t forget google already does a (relatively) good job of stopping click fraud with adwords listings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>User data would be a lot harder to game &#8211; don&#8217;t forget google already does a (relatively) good job of stopping click fraud with adwords listings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Altoft</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-patent-granted-rank-adjustments-via-click-data/#comment-190275</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Altoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3247#comment-190275</guid>
		<description>User data is actually a lot harder to game than link data - think about how hard it is for Google to spot some paid links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>User data is actually a lot harder to game than link data &#8211; think about how hard it is for Google to spot some paid links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Available Domains Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-patent-granted-rank-adjustments-via-click-data/#comment-190222</link>
		<dc:creator>Available Domains Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3247#comment-190222</guid>
		<description>Interesting patent. May serve the searches well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting patent. May serve the searches well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
