<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google News no longer requires stupid numbers in the URL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-news-no-longer-requires-stupid-numbers-in-the-url/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-news-no-longer-requires-stupid-numbers-in-the-url/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:06:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seo Tips For Webmasters And Newbie Website owners &#187; URL Structure: The Closer to the Root &#8211; the Better?</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-news-no-longer-requires-stupid-numbers-in-the-url/#comment-162969</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo Tips For Webmasters And Newbie Website owners &#187; URL Structure: The Closer to the Root &#8211; the Better?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2052#comment-162969</guid>
		<description>[...] was recommending using numbers in the end of the file path to get accepted to Google news (which is no longer true btw). This /XXXXX/ part could possibly look like separate folder and it would be weird if Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was recommending using numbers in the end of the file path to get accepted to Google news (which is no longer true btw). This /XXXXX/ part could possibly look like separate folder and it would be weird if Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: URL Structure: The Closer to the Root - the Better?</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-news-no-longer-requires-stupid-numbers-in-the-url/#comment-162493</link>
		<dc:creator>URL Structure: The Closer to the Root - the Better?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2052#comment-162493</guid>
		<description>[...] was recommending using numbers in the end of the file path to get accepted to Google news (which is no longer true btw). This /XXXXX/ part could possibly look like separate folder and it would be weird if Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was recommending using numbers in the end of the file path to get accepted to Google news (which is no longer true btw). This /XXXXX/ part could possibly look like separate folder and it would be weird if Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark (Isle of Wight, UK)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-news-no-longer-requires-stupid-numbers-in-the-url/#comment-139709</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark (Isle of Wight, UK)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2052#comment-139709</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update. I&#039;d just read your previous article and I my first thought was crumps, that mess up the permalink structure to try and get into Google News!

I didn&#039;t realise the potential to get into Google News was so achievable, and I have even more things to think about now when creating content! I will have to read more about the submission guidelines and see how compliance might change the structure of site content in future. Cheers, Mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update. I&#8217;d just read your previous article and I my first thought was crumps, that mess up the permalink structure to try and get into Google News!</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t realise the potential to get into Google News was so achievable, and I have even more things to think about now when creating content! I will have to read more about the submission guidelines and see how compliance might change the structure of site content in future. Cheers, Mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Why a Google News Sitemap?</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-news-no-longer-requires-stupid-numbers-in-the-url/#comment-136039</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Why a Google News Sitemap?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2052#comment-136039</guid>
		<description>[...] Google News Sitemap must follow rules edicted by Google Publisher Help Center. One thing to notice is that the requirement for using 3 digits in the article URL has been lifted recently. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google News Sitemap must follow rules edicted by Google Publisher Help Center. One thing to notice is that the requirement for using 3 digits in the article URL has been lifted recently. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dotless Domain &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dotless Domain - Google: Numbers No Longer Required in URLs</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-news-no-longer-requires-stupid-numbers-in-the-url/#comment-130817</link>
		<dc:creator>Dotless Domain &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dotless Domain - Google: Numbers No Longer Required in URLs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2052#comment-130817</guid>
		<description>[...] These numbers didn&#8217;t mean much and were primarily used to get Google, Inc. (Goog)&#8217;s News spider worked. With the announcement, most webmasters have started removing these numbers to keep their URLs keyword specific. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] These numbers didn&#8217;t mean much and were primarily used to get Google, Inc. (Goog)&#8217;s News spider worked. With the announcement, most webmasters have started removing these numbers to keep their URLs keyword specific. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google News- Three Digit Numbers No Longer Required in the URLs! &#187; PageTraffic SEO Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-news-no-longer-requires-stupid-numbers-in-the-url/#comment-130724</link>
		<dc:creator>Google News- Three Digit Numbers No Longer Required in the URLs! &#187; PageTraffic SEO Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2052#comment-130724</guid>
		<description>[...]   Webmasters are no longer required to include three digit numbers at the end of the URL to be in Google News. However, they need to submit a Google News sitemap to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   Webmasters are no longer required to include three digit numbers at the end of the URL to be in Google News. However, they need to submit a Google News sitemap to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Barham</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-news-no-longer-requires-stupid-numbers-in-the-url/#comment-130204</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Barham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2052#comment-130204</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this news about Google News, I also added digits just for them on one site. Will be losing them from now on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this news about Google News, I also added digits just for them on one site. Will be losing them from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-news-no-longer-requires-stupid-numbers-in-the-url/#comment-129342</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2052#comment-129342</guid>
		<description>I always prefer a much cleaner looking URL structure. I think it works well for branding when it looks neat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always prefer a much cleaner looking URL structure. I think it works well for branding when it looks neat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-news-no-longer-requires-stupid-numbers-in-the-url/#comment-129277</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2052#comment-129277</guid>
		<description>No problem, I write too much.  People easily miss stuff I write.  Just wanted to add that link for date purposes, this way we know it was before Jan 28, 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem, I write too much.  People easily miss stuff I write.  Just wanted to add that link for date purposes, this way we know it was before Jan 28, 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Altoft</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-news-no-longer-requires-stupid-numbers-in-the-url/#comment-129276</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Altoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2052#comment-129276</guid>
		<description>Thanks Barry, hadn&#039;t spotted that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Barry, hadn&#8217;t spotted that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
