Google: Links in content are more valuable

by Patrick Altoft on August 21, 2009

Since it’s Friday let’s finish the week with a nice short and straightforward video post. Most people know this already but judging by the number of people still building sidebar and footer links it’s fair to assume not everybody does.

Summary – Links within content pass more trust & authority than links in the footer of a website.

Patrick Altoft is Director of Search at Leeds based digital & SEO agency Branded3. Patrick also runs Blogstorm.

You can get our blog posts delivered for free by email every day - simply add your email address to the box below or alternatively grab the RSS feed.

Read some similar posts

{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

Steven Morgan 21 Aug 2009 at 1:44 pm

Its such a pity Google need to waste their time creating videos like this – I’d much rather them answer usefull questions.

tag44 21 Aug 2009 at 2:11 pm
Find me on Digg | Facebook | Reddit | StumbleUpon | Twitter

We all know very well and its common knowledge that links in content of any site plays very important role.

More comments from tag44
fusionunlimited 21 Aug 2009 at 2:22 pm
Find me on Digg | Flickr | Reddit | StumbleUpon | Twitter

common knowledge but always good to get it straight from the horse’s mouth. although i think it’s key he says “reserve the right” – if a link on site X is contextual it doesn’t automatically mean it will carry more weight than a link from site Y’s sidebar – there’s obviously a lot more factors in play and i don’t necessarily think he’s saying contextually links will ALWAYS count for more..

More comments from fusionunlimited
BLOGERCISE 21 Aug 2009 at 2:26 pm
Find me on Twitter

Maybe people are building side and footer bars for their users? I use them all the time, whether Google trusts those links or not is of no consequence to me! They aren’t links to my sites after all :)

The classic theme author footer link is an interesting one. If 1000s of people use that theme then that’s a lot of back links back to the theme author – but isn’t it right that they should rank well because their theme is a popular one?

But anyway, I don’t see how this would change the way I build sites, only that if I am requesting a back link it should go in content but often you don’t really have that kind of control (which is why Google uses back links in the first place!).

More comments from BLOGERCISE
Stefan 21 Aug 2009 at 3:28 pm

I agree with you Steven. There are many questions for Google I think are more interesting than this one, which you can find a answer to almost everywhere. Hopefully it didn’t take them to much time and effort to make this video.

Giles 21 Aug 2009 at 3:34 pm

I think it just makes sense, having regular occuring text and links in headers, sidebars and footers will be ignored. Having individual pages with unique text that contain links won’t be ignored..simple

Luci 21 Aug 2009 at 5:08 pm
Find me on Twitter

Videos can be a useful reference though. SEO is changing so quick, i know i can barely keep track of it! Unique text = good, however, is something I’ve got drilled into my brain. Thanks for the reminder though!

More comments from Luci
Manji 22 Aug 2009 at 5:52 am

This is suspicious. Why is google making a video? Google just want to prevent people from buying links.

SEO-Doctor 23 Aug 2009 at 10:47 am

There was talk of footer links being discounted, but I do not belive this theory. If you optimise someones site and they offer you a footer link from their PR6 homepage, your going to take it. And I’m sure it will have value.

More comments from SEO-Doctor
cemper 24 Aug 2009 at 5:30 pm
Find me on Facebook | Twitter

:-) lol – surprise surprise… this is news from 2004 …. nice tough that Google releases a video now…

More comments from cemper
Chappers 02 Sep 2009 at 9:51 am

Can’t say I understand the hating for this vid – it’s a quick question that only needs a quick answer. And with regards to there being more useful questions that could be answered, I’d argue that there are lots of people that are new to the industry (the ones that started in the industry after 2004!!) who this will be new and useful too.

What’s useful is subjective. I think no matter what question matt cutts answers will always be greeted with a “well I knew that already” from someone. I say fair play to him for not just fielding the harder techie questions.

webandrank 05 Sep 2009 at 8:41 am
Find me on Digg | Flickr | Reddit | StumbleUpon | Twitter

Right the link in the content feed better the search engine spieder but about the quality
some time the sidebar link is better even if you look from the quality of the website and all related factors.

More comments from webandrank

Leave a Comment (registration is optional)

Registration is free, takes about 5 seconds and is worth doing.

You can use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href=""> <b> <blockquote> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>