<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Changes Misspelled Results &#8211; Did You Mean&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-changes-misspelled-results-did-you-mean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-changes-misspelled-results-did-you-mean/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calgary Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-changes-misspelled-results-did-you-mean/#comment-277705</link>
		<dc:creator>Calgary Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1641#comment-277705</guid>
		<description>Up until very recently our client&#039;s site, http://www.uniblokcanada.com/ used to be the first result when a search was made for &quot;Uniblok&quot; 
Now however, Google provides this in its result page:
&quot;Showing results for uniblock. Search instead for uniblok.&quot;
  
Particularly frustrating about the results is that the first result that comes up in this search has nothing to do with the replaced &quot;Uniblock&quot; at all.

As it stands now there are over 15,000 pages which get returned for Uniblok.  They have unique and highly recognized products in their market and they are a very established company. They have had this site for years.  

This is an unusual SEO problem in that there seems little clear guidance in strategical approaches towards correcting it beyond recommendations to &quot;add pages linking back.&quot;  I have read nothing else concrete beyond that except to adopt a &#039;keep your fingers crossed and wait and see&#039; attitude. 

Our client would like their site to be number one again for searches involving their name. Is there any helpful or constructive advice anyone can offer to help amend this as soon as possible?

Thank you.

BTW: Strategies attempted so far: organic SEO makeover of client&#039;s site and writing of offsite articles on reputable news sites with appropriate deep level link backs. The campaign has seem dramatic increases in all targeted keyphrases except that most important one: Uniblok.
http://www.uniblokcanada.com is that site again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up until very recently our client&#8217;s site, <a href="http://www.uniblokcanada.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.uniblokcanada.com/</a> used to be the first result when a search was made for &#8220;Uniblok&#8221;<br />
Now however, Google provides this in its result page:<br />
&#8220;Showing results for uniblock. Search instead for uniblok.&#8221;</p>
<p>Particularly frustrating about the results is that the first result that comes up in this search has nothing to do with the replaced &#8220;Uniblock&#8221; at all.</p>
<p>As it stands now there are over 15,000 pages which get returned for Uniblok.  They have unique and highly recognized products in their market and they are a very established company. They have had this site for years.  </p>
<p>This is an unusual SEO problem in that there seems little clear guidance in strategical approaches towards correcting it beyond recommendations to &#8220;add pages linking back.&#8221;  I have read nothing else concrete beyond that except to adopt a &#8216;keep your fingers crossed and wait and see&#8217; attitude. </p>
<p>Our client would like their site to be number one again for searches involving their name. Is there any helpful or constructive advice anyone can offer to help amend this as soon as possible?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p>BTW: Strategies attempted so far: organic SEO makeover of client&#8217;s site and writing of offsite articles on reputable news sites with appropriate deep level link backs. The campaign has seem dramatic increases in all targeted keyphrases except that most important one: Uniblok.<br />
<a href="http://www.uniblokcanada.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.uniblokcanada.com</a> is that site again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Hecker Lawyer Headlines &#187; 6 Ways to Optimize Your SEO for Misspellings â€“ And Why It Pays to be a Bad Speller</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-changes-misspelled-results-did-you-mean/#comment-231800</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Hecker Lawyer Headlines &#187; 6 Ways to Optimize Your SEO for Misspellings â€“ And Why It Pays to be a Bad Speller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1641#comment-231800</guid>
		<description>[...] important thing to note is that in the past few years, Google has changed the way it displays search results for misspellings. They now show &#8220;Did you mean:&#8221; with a link to the correct search query and its top 2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] important thing to note is that in the past few years, Google has changed the way it displays search results for misspellings. They now show &#8220;Did you mean:&#8221; with a link to the correct search query and its top 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6 Ways to Optimize Your SEO for Misspellings &#8211; And Why It Pays to be a Bad Speller</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-changes-misspelled-results-did-you-mean/#comment-225778</link>
		<dc:creator>6 Ways to Optimize Your SEO for Misspellings &#8211; And Why It Pays to be a Bad Speller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1641#comment-225778</guid>
		<description>[...] important thing to note is that in the past few years, Google has changed the way it displays search results for misspellings. They now show &#8220;Did you mean:&#8221; with a link to the correct search query and its top 2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] important thing to note is that in the past few years, Google has changed the way it displays search results for misspellings. They now show &#8220;Did you mean:&#8221; with a link to the correct search query and its top 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-changes-misspelled-results-did-you-mean/#comment-87667</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1641#comment-87667</guid>
		<description>That is just a bunch of Jew censorship.  Google seeking to attack small businesses. This tool was implemented to be a weapon of censorship against your business. In fact the intenret is a military applicatoin under the wrong hands. Its now being used as a war agains freedom by companies like google that want covet the masses and not allow for public voice or business. ultimately a governent ran search engine should deal a death blow to all search engines</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is just a bunch of Jew censorship.  Google seeking to attack small businesses. This tool was implemented to be a weapon of censorship against your business. In fact the intenret is a military applicatoin under the wrong hands. Its now being used as a war agains freedom by companies like google that want covet the masses and not allow for public voice or business. ultimately a governent ran search engine should deal a death blow to all search engines</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marjory</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-changes-misspelled-results-did-you-mean/#comment-87492</link>
		<dc:creator>Marjory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1641#comment-87492</guid>
		<description>I think that it would be a nice feature if it worked properly.  Unfortunately, if you are looking for a brand name, the suggestion is sometimes not very palatable. Try searching for gorank in Google  and the result is actually kind of offensive. I would be more comfortable with it if it was only being used for common misspellings/searches but when it gives me the wrong result (and potentially an offensive one), it&#039;s annoying. Why can&#039;t they just leave it at Did you mean? and let me click again if I can&#039;t spell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it would be a nice feature if it worked properly.  Unfortunately, if you are looking for a brand name, the suggestion is sometimes not very palatable. Try searching for gorank in Google  and the result is actually kind of offensive. I would be more comfortable with it if it was only being used for common misspellings/searches but when it gives me the wrong result (and potentially an offensive one), it&#8217;s annoying. Why can&#8217;t they just leave it at Did you mean? and let me click again if I can&#8217;t spell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adsensi for domains &#38; misspell corrections</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-changes-misspelled-results-did-you-mean/#comment-85817</link>
		<dc:creator>Adsensi for domains &#38; misspell corrections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1641#comment-85817</guid>
		<description>[...] or google.com - but the chief spam-killer at Google: Matt Cutts remarked on Patrick Altoft of BlogStorm being the first to have noticed this and that kinda ads a little weight to the idea that this is a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or google.com &#8211; but the chief spam-killer at Google: Matt Cutts remarked on Patrick Altoft of BlogStorm being the first to have noticed this and that kinda ads a little weight to the idea that this is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google ajuste son tir pour descendre le Typo</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-changes-misspelled-results-did-you-mean/#comment-85523</link>
		<dc:creator>Google ajuste son tir pour descendre le Typo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1641#comment-85523</guid>
		<description>[...] de BlogStorm - fouineur et perspicace comme d&#8217;hab - a remarquÃ© que Google commence Ã  introduire, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de BlogStorm &#8211; fouineur et perspicace comme d&#8217;hab &#8211; a remarquÃ© que Google commence Ã  introduire, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jemin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-changes-misspelled-results-did-you-mean/#comment-85198</link>
		<dc:creator>jemin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1641#comment-85198</guid>
		<description>I canâ€™t see the change, it might be only for users in the UK . and i also check in proxy but no any changes in Did you mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I canâ€™t see the change, it might be only for users in the UK . and i also check in proxy but no any changes in Did you mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Altoft</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-changes-misspelled-results-did-you-mean/#comment-85134</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Altoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1641#comment-85134</guid>
		<description>Matt I find it interesting that the result in 2nd place isn&#039;t the same result that you get when you perform a normal search with the correct spelling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt I find it interesting that the result in 2nd place isn&#8217;t the same result that you get when you perform a normal search with the correct spelling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRN Funding Factoring Specialist</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-changes-misspelled-results-did-you-mean/#comment-85111</link>
		<dc:creator>PRN Funding Factoring Specialist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=1641#comment-85111</guid>
		<description>Great news!  Thanks for noting the change...I only recently started noticing it myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news!  Thanks for noting the change&#8230;I only recently started noticing it myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

