Comments on: Google about to give Digg and Wikipedia huge traffic boost http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-boosting-digg-traffic/ Internet marketing and search engine optimisation Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Spirulina Girl http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-boosting-digg-traffic/#comment-1937 Spirulina Girl Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:12:43 +0000 http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-boosting-digg-traffic/#comment-1937 I agree that it's about time google did this. I always used them on my sites but was never sure how google actually treated them. I did notice from serps though that it does still manage to pull the keyword from the url even if the url is in the format keyword1keyword2 etc. I agree that it’s about time google did this. I always used them on my sites but was never sure how google actually treated them. I did notice from serps though that it does still manage to pull the keyword from the url even if the url is in the format keyword1keyword2 etc.

]]> By: Wolverine http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-boosting-digg-traffic/#comment-567 Wolverine Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:46:03 +0000 http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-boosting-digg-traffic/#comment-567 Great news. I have been using underscores as separator on my sites and hence hopefully some new traffic will come my way. I do not have as many pages as Digg and Wikipedia but am close behind <img src="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/images/icon_smile.gif" alt="Smile"> Great news. I have been using underscores as separator on my sites and hence hopefully some new traffic will come my way. I do not have as many pages as Digg and Wikipedia but am close behind Smile

]]> By: Rose http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-boosting-digg-traffic/#comment-517 Rose Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:29:40 +0000 http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-boosting-digg-traffic/#comment-517 Thanks for the heads up on this. Thanks for the heads up on this.

]]> By: John King http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-boosting-digg-traffic/#comment-515 John King Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:18:18 +0000 http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-boosting-digg-traffic/#comment-515 Its about Google got around to this, really underscores are quite a bit more friendly to the eye then dashes. The only area where dashes are better is that they're more obtrusive so people notice them for the next time they need to type the URL. Its about Google got around to this, really underscores are quite a bit more friendly to the eye then dashes. The only area where dashes are better is that they’re more obtrusive so people notice them for the next time they need to type the URL.

]]> By: Patrick Altoft http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-boosting-digg-traffic/#comment-513 Patrick Altoft Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:49:07 +0000 http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-boosting-digg-traffic/#comment-513 Wow, I didn't even think of Wikipedia. Wow, I didn’t even think of Wikipedia.

]]> By: Sergi http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-boosting-digg-traffic/#comment-512 Sergi Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:21:22 +0000 http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-boosting-digg-traffic/#comment-512 >>Digg is probably the largest site that uses underscores<br /> <br /> Good news for wikipedia too ~12 millions pages... ;) >>Digg is probably the largest site that uses underscores

Good news for wikipedia too ~12 millions pages… ;)

]]>