<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Last Day of Google Analytics Old Interface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-analytics-new-interface/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-analytics-new-interface/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shimon</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-analytics-new-interface/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>Shimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-analytics-new-interface/#comment-458</guid>
		<description>I will miss the old interface. Even though I liked new one from the first look, still i&#039;m using old one, because i&#039;m more used to it, it has more clear reports by hours and some other are easier to use also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will miss the old interface. Even though I liked new one from the first look, still i&#8217;m using old one, because i&#8217;m more used to it, it has more clear reports by hours and some other are easier to use also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John King</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-analytics-new-interface/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>John King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-analytics-new-interface/#comment-440</guid>
		<description>I greatly dislike the new interface.. Luckily I&#039;m almost finished with my own analytics platform. It doesn&#039;t do even close to as many things as Google&#039;s however it gives me accurate reports on whether people came from Google CPC, or Yahoo CPC. It also tells me if people came from the first page on google.com or the 3rd page of google.co.uk. Oh also it gives me accurate stats on conversions! Really it gives me all the stats I tend to track.. I guess I&#039;ll leave analytics on if I want to check monitor type and geo location settings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I greatly dislike the new interface.. Luckily I&#8217;m almost finished with my own analytics platform. It doesn&#8217;t do even close to as many things as Google&#8217;s however it gives me accurate reports on whether people came from Google CPC, or Yahoo CPC. It also tells me if people came from the first page on google.com or the 3rd page of google.co.uk. Oh also it gives me accurate stats on conversions! Really it gives me all the stats I tend to track.. I guess I&#8217;ll leave analytics on if I want to check monitor type and geo location settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-analytics-new-interface/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-analytics-new-interface/#comment-437</guid>
		<description>It is a shame to see the old interface go. I prefer it over the new one. I find it much easier and faster to find my what I need in the old interface. I can just take a glance at it and get a good overview of my site. When you have close to 50 websites, this saves a lot of time. I wish Google would reconsider and let the old interface remain an option. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a shame to see the old interface go. I prefer it over the new one. I find it much easier and faster to find my what I need in the old interface. I can just take a glance at it and get a good overview of my site. When you have close to 50 websites, this saves a lot of time. I wish Google would reconsider and let the old interface remain an option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1916home.net</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-analytics-new-interface/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>1916home.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-analytics-new-interface/#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Booooo. I actually liked the old analytics better. The new ones arent as accurate. My server has its own analytics built in and reports much better info than the new Google version. For example, I get totally different keyword searches. The old Google Analytics keywords matched my servers keywords. Obviously Google is pulling different info, possibly from their searches only, and my server picks up ANY keyword searches. OK, maybe its not bad. I now have more data, more info, and more keywords to crunch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regardless, Google is still quick and easy to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Booooo. I actually liked the old analytics better. The new ones arent as accurate. My server has its own analytics built in and reports much better info than the new Google version. For example, I get totally different keyword searches. The old Google Analytics keywords matched my servers keywords. Obviously Google is pulling different info, possibly from their searches only, and my server picks up ANY keyword searches. OK, maybe its not bad. I now have more data, more info, and more keywords to crunch.</p>
<p>Regardless, Google is still quick and easy to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

