<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good news for SEOs, Flash is now indexable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/good-news-for-seos-flash-is-now-indexable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/good-news-for-seos-flash-is-now-indexable/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Design Norwich</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/good-news-for-seos-flash-is-now-indexable/#comment-294918</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Design Norwich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=697#comment-294918</guid>
		<description>i find it best to avoid flash and i don&#039;t think people really want to be browsing flash sites. People want quick easy and accesable sites to get straight to what they need quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i find it best to avoid flash and i don&#8217;t think people really want to be browsing flash sites. People want quick easy and accesable sites to get straight to what they need quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Agency</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/good-news-for-seos-flash-is-now-indexable/#comment-265744</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Agency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=697#comment-265744</guid>
		<description>What we have found is that as long as the site is not totally Flash based, then there are no issues. The issues aride when there is not text rich content for the engines to find. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we have found is that as long as the site is not totally Flash based, then there are no issues. The issues aride when there is not text rich content for the engines to find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claire stokoe</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/good-news-for-seos-flash-is-now-indexable/#comment-47569</link>
		<dc:creator>claire stokoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=697#comment-47569</guid>
		<description>Yipeeeee... finally, design meets search. thank you Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yipeeeee&#8230; finally, design meets search. thank you Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Altoft</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/good-news-for-seos-flash-is-now-indexable/#comment-46512</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Altoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=697#comment-46512</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure that if the Flash files can be hacked the spammers can inject links. If they can hack the Flash files they can probably hack other parts of the site too though, unless Flash files are easier to hack?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure that if the Flash files can be hacked the spammers can inject links. If they can hack the Flash files they can probably hack other parts of the site too though, unless Flash files are easier to hack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hauselman</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/good-news-for-seos-flash-is-now-indexable/#comment-46501</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Hauselman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=697#comment-46501</guid>
		<description>Google has been saying it can index Flash sites for a while - were they lying?
Deep linking is not available, nor are dynamic URLs - meaning you canâ€™t bookmark pages inside the .swf, nor can Google link to a page inside the .swf. Also - the key to SEO is being able to use Google Analytics to track where the visitor is going, how long they stay, etc. This doesnâ€™t allow that data to be tracked either.
I have conquered the Flash/SEO Mountain - you can see it in action at:

http://www.davincimediaworks.com

The back button in the browser works, each page is bookmark-able, Google can deep link to any page, and Google Analytics tracks each page perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has been saying it can index Flash sites for a while &#8211; were they lying?<br />
Deep linking is not available, nor are dynamic URLs &#8211; meaning you canâ€™t bookmark pages inside the .swf, nor can Google link to a page inside the .swf. Also &#8211; the key to SEO is being able to use Google Analytics to track where the visitor is going, how long they stay, etc. This doesnâ€™t allow that data to be tracked either.<br />
I have conquered the Flash/SEO Mountain &#8211; you can see it in action at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.davincimediaworks.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.davincimediaworks.com</a></p>
<p>The back button in the browser works, each page is bookmark-able, Google can deep link to any page, and Google Analytics tracks each page perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrpurple</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/good-news-for-seos-flash-is-now-indexable/#comment-46467</link>
		<dc:creator>mrpurple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=697#comment-46467</guid>
		<description>Hi Patrick,

I&#039;ve commented similar on Matt blog, but what&#039;s your opinion.

Depending on how deep Google can crawl SWF, then is this not a potential gold mine for spammers who could embedd hidden links within the SWF file and then go ahead with an online advertising campaign. With these links embedded within the SWF adverts, they could potentially gain thousands of crawlable links!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patrick,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve commented similar on Matt blog, but what&#8217;s your opinion.</p>
<p>Depending on how deep Google can crawl SWF, then is this not a potential gold mine for spammers who could embedd hidden links within the SWF file and then go ahead with an online advertising campaign. With these links embedded within the SWF adverts, they could potentially gain thousands of crawlable links!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Littlemore</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/good-news-for-seos-flash-is-now-indexable/#comment-46393</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Littlemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=697#comment-46393</guid>
		<description>Long time lurker and first time commenter!

It&#039;ll probably take some education to make Flash web designers optimise their sites properly so I guess it&#039;s a good thing that Google and Adobe are doing this. But I can just see the search results now:

Results 1-10000 for &quot;some search terms&quot;

Skip Intro

Skip Intro

Skip Intro

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long time lurker and first time commenter!</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll probably take some education to make Flash web designers optimise their sites properly so I guess it&#8217;s a good thing that Google and Adobe are doing this. But I can just see the search results now:</p>
<p>Results 1-10000 for &#8220;some search terms&#8221;</p>
<p>Skip Intro</p>
<p>Skip Intro</p>
<p>Skip Intro</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/good-news-for-seos-flash-is-now-indexable/#comment-46392</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=697#comment-46392</guid>
		<description>Ugh. Grammar Nazi here.. you mean &quot;SEOs&quot; not &quot;SEO&#039;s&quot;.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/chi-typo-guys-0521may21,0,701362.story</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh. Grammar Nazi here.. you mean &#8220;SEOs&#8221; not &#8220;SEO&#8217;s&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/chi-typo-guys-0521may21,0,701362.story" rel="nofollow">http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/chi-typo-guys-0521may21,0,701362.story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

