<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gizmodo vs Engadget: Gizmodo needs SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/gizmodo-vs-engadget-gizmodo-needs-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/gizmodo-vs-engadget-gizmodo-needs-seo/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: UÄŸur SAMSA</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/gizmodo-vs-engadget-gizmodo-needs-seo/#comment-28932</link>
		<dc:creator>UÄŸur SAMSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 06:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/gizmodo-vs-engadget-gizmodo-needs-seo/#comment-28932</guid>
		<description>Engadget have 1.764.000 readers. Gizmodo? I think Engadget readers more than Gizmodo readers. And I looked Gizmodo&#039;s page views, very poor. 

Page visit : 565,945,941
Page views : 638,643,824

Via : http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&amp;s=sm7gizmodous</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engadget have 1.764.000 readers. Gizmodo? I think Engadget readers more than Gizmodo readers. And I looked Gizmodo&#8217;s page views, very poor. </p>
<p>Page visit : 565,945,941<br />
Page views : 638,643,824</p>
<p>Via : <a href="http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&#038;s=sm7gizmodous" rel="nofollow">http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&#038;s=sm7gizmodous</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

