Digg spammers are stupid
If you have the know how to get 48 Diggs in half an hour wouldn’t you think you would know how to make your spam look at bit less like spam?

Post category: Social Media Tweet
If you have the know how to get 48 Diggs in half an hour wouldn’t you think you would know how to make your spam look at bit less like spam?

Post category: Social Media Tweet
You can get our blog posts delivered for free by email every day - simply add your email address to the box above, or alternatively you can grab the RSS feed.
RT @rishil: If you want learn about Press Releases and how to work them for SEO - read this>>> http://t.co/yt764fv6
@patrickaltoft / yesterday@MarriottGolfUK If you want to run a competition to get followers you should try our http://t.co/urrpvJh1 site to do the giveaway
@patrickaltoft / yesterday@randfish You have email support system for @seomoz so you need to divert your work related emails through that rather than thru you
@patrickaltoft / about 2 days ago@randfish Try emailing patrick@blogstorm.co.uk and see what it says. Emails now come to the company where we can scalably manage them
@patrickaltoft / about 2 days ago
Comments
Read the 3 comments below, or add your own!
I see this a lot, it usually involves trading diggs on digitalpoint forums, and 24 hours later everyone gets banned… Rinse and repeat!
Wow that is really funny. What a sad waste of time for that person. I mean, fine he is selling something, everyone is selling something but come on! Have some grace, some finesse, something!
Yeah digitalpoint is a nightmare for trading things like that. I remember seeing one post where they guaranteed 1st page on digg within 24 hours. This is the main thing that is annoying my about Digg and the whole link baiting thing at the moment. While writing good unique content of your own for link bait is a good thing is valid and good i think. Too many people rip off articles and use them as link bait. They are not even obvious about it either, I have seen several articles directly copying the BBC News and just declaring the source of the article at the bottom. It is kinda frustrating too as sometimes I just think I just just climb onto the bandwagon and do the same seeing as spamming digg has considerably less consequences than spamming Google etc