Top websites ranked by Digg saturation

by Patrick Altoft on / 71 responses

Tracking the number of times a particular blog hits the Digg homepage isn’t really a great indicator of popularity. Some Digg stories get a couple of hundred Diggs while others are far more popular and attract several thousand.

Luckily Google offers a simple way to measure the overall popularity of a site with the Digg audience by making use of its site: command. This tracks all mentions of a site including when people link to you in the comments section.

Looking at the results for BlogStorm we can see that my site has a Digg saturation of just under 3,000 meaning that the phrase blogstorm.co.uk is mentioned 3000 times on the Digg website.

Digg Saturation

“Why does this matter?” I hear you ask. Well, looking at the number of links to a site from Digg is an easy way for Google to see what sites should be ranking and which are spam. Its easy to get one low quality story to the Digg front page but to fake a Digg saturation figure of well into the thousands is totally impossible.

The Top sites by Digg Saturation

Some of you might be thinking that due to the way the Digg archives work this list will favour sites that have been on the Digg homepage recently. This is clearly the case but if I was Google I would want to rank sites that are popular now rather than sites that were popular a few months ago. Perhaps thats why hitting the front page of social media sites gives an immediate boost in search engine rankings.

Whats your Digg saturation? If it’s more than Matt Cutts on 851 add a comment below and I’ll update the list.

Patrick Altoft is Director of Search at Branded3, a Leeds SEO & Digital Agency specialising in SEO, Web Design, Development & Social Media.

Get daily posts direct to your inbox

You can get our blog posts delivered for free by email every day - simply add your email address to the box above, or alternatively you can grab the RSS feed.

Comments

Read the 68 comments below, or add your own!

October 3, 2007 at 1:28pm

Interesting post. I just checked my site. PickTheBrain is at 2,870.

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 2:33pm

your list is sorely lacking. Kotaku.com has 33,300 results and is not on your list.

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 2:57pm

Nice way to measure digg success. I never thought of this. Big Grin

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 6:11pm

My site, simplehelp.net, has 2,800.

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 6:59pm

My site, micahville.com, has 1,020..

Reply

Ray Wert
October 3, 2007 at 7:30pm

Jalopnik – 17,400

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 8:13pm

Mine, ohgizmo.com, is at 5,060.

That should put me at #32…

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 8:13pm

I hope to get us up there soon. We’re close with 675. OnMyList, The only place to list your pants off.

Reply

Jan
October 3, 2007 at 8:14pm

My site, profit42.com has a digg saturation of 1910, would be great if you added it to the list.

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 8:15pm

imagechan has 2,210
Also an image from it is the 35th most dugg article ever Big Grin

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 8:16pm

Here’s a few:

timesonline.co.uk
dailymail.co.uk

I could go on all day.

Reply

Darg
October 3, 2007 at 8:18pm

Wired has 43,300 Smile

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 8:22pm

My site has seen the Digg affect quite a bit. According to Google my site, DesignVitality.com, has 2,160 which puts me higher than Matt Cutts and quite a few more on your list.

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 8:23pm

Inhabitat has 5,460.

Reply

Me
October 3, 2007 at 8:24pm

John,

I bet if you were to hit ctrl-f and type ‘Kotaku.com’ you would find it nestled just below treehugger and just above macrumors at number 13 on the list with 33,500

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 8:24pm

Just checked two that should have hit the list:

FileFront.com – 10,200
GamerNode.com – 7,800

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 8:25pm

mine has 1360, whenpenguinsattack.com

Reply

Nick
October 3, 2007 at 8:27pm

racketboy.com has 1,800
Destructoid has 27,200

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 8:29pm

http://www.microsoft.com, 20,500 Smile.

Somehow not in the list ;-)

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 8:38pm

Way to miss Maddox, his articles regularly make it to the front page of digg, and his iPhone one alone has over 14,000 diggs (posted about a month ago).

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 8:42pm

Dailygaming.net has around 1100. It’d be at the very bottom, but it’s still there.

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 8:42pm

Hey we beat Matt Cutts! I work for Gameriot.com Smile 1,420.

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 8:45pm

Maddox doesn’t have enough saturation for the list.

Reply

more and more
October 3, 2007 at 8:47pm

myspace.com
facebook.com
break.com
wikipedia.org
msn.com

just read alexa.com if you want to have a comprehensive list.

Reply

Dan Russell
October 3, 2007 at 8:59pm

Cracked?

XKCD?

Surely these belong.

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 9:04pm

http://www.tumbl.us has a saturation 4,520

Reply

Daniel
October 3, 2007 at 9:11pm

Uh, MSN.com has almost 60,000. What’s the point of this unless you input every website on the internet. Your list only contains the sites that came to your mind while making it.

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 9:17pm

Daniel, I see MSN.com at 36,400. Maybe you are hitting a different Google datacenter or something.

If you want to suggest some sites that are missing please feel free. I made the list based on my own knowledge as a long term Digg user and by looking at the Technorati top blogs.

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 9:33pm

WoW Insider, 1130.

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 10:01pm

670 + 342 (I have a domain alias that ppl submit as well)
paulstamatiou.com + pstam.com

so I guess you could say my saturation is 1012

Reply

no
October 3, 2007 at 10:41pm

Who cares about Digg? A bunch of navel-gazing douches.

Reply

October 3, 2007 at 11:27pm

http://menshealth.com has 8,730

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 12:26am

Cool list! You missed wikiHow, which would have been #37 on the list with 11,300.

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 12:39am

It’s a nice idea, but you’re not measuring it correctly. Right now, you’re simply searching for any pages that Digg that have the domains as words on the pages, not as links. I mean, look at [site:digg.com yahoo.com]. That’s bringing up pages where people are putting in yahoo.com email addresses, among other things. Plus, in other cases, you’re getting pages that have links from profiles rather than stories.

A better way would be to do something like this.

OK, that’s searching Digg itself for all stories to the youtube.com URL. Look at the bottom, and you’ll see there are around 1525 pages of results, 10 stories per page, so a saturation of 15,250 stories. Tick the buried option if you want to get more accurate. Even better, you might scrap and total the raw number of Diggs earned for all stories. Now that would be a metric — which site has the most cumulative Diggs over time.

Reply

LizardDude
October 4, 2007 at 1:16am

littlegreenfootballs.com has 10,100

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 1:18am

My site is Get Rich Slowly, and it has a saturation of 3,800!

Reply

JON
October 4, 2007 at 1:54am

techdirt.com 10,600

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 2:29am

Check out natewhitehill.com He’ll soon pass up John Chow and Pro Blogger no problem. He own’s blogdesign.com which is taking off. Profits up over 1000% in first month!!

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 3:10am

I thought my site got a lot of Diggs, but that’s wild… # 12

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 4:44am

Wow, this is a very different concept. I never thought to check for Digg links to see if a site is spam or not. Great article.

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 7:14am

Danny, I agree that posting Yahoo email addresses will skew the data but I was trying to measure the popularity of a domain by seeing how many times it was mentioned on Digg, not just how many times it was Dugg. The two are not going to produce the same results.

Also I wanted to bring up results that would be very easy for Google to incorporate into the algorithm, totalling the raw number of Diggs wouldn’t be as easy.

Finally there are some sites that are always Dugg by the same group of people which would mean less Digg saturation using my method. Sites that have Diggs from a wide range of people would appear in more categories and in more peoples profiles and therefore should be thought of as more popular.

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 7:20am

Josh, Nate might be great at designing blogs but his Digg saturation is only 185 so he doesn’t make the list.

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 8:34am

Nice concept, my blog ririanproject.com has 2280.

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 10:50am

BBspot.com has 5,710.

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 11:57am

i cant find mine anywhere …
guess i need to work on it better …
spend some time informing people of my blog …
hehe …

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 1:39pm

You use to be able to do this with MSN Search using linkfromdomain… alas they shut it down due to spammers (and broke a lot of end user efforts, very lame). Read more at http://blogs.msdn.com/andyed/archive/2006/10/17/search-macros-recap.aspx

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 3:01pm

linuxtracker.org has 2070.

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 3:10pm

mine has 1,800
racketboy.com

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 5:23pm

Hi Patrick! Thanks for this, but I’d like to address one thing:
>>totalling the raw number of Diggs wouldn’t be as easy.

Well, here it is for you! Top 100 Sites on Digg.com ordered by the Nett No. of Diggs. Hope you find it useful…

Reply

David
October 4, 2007 at 5:36pm

Phoronix.com has 5,390 in Google at Digg.

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 6:23pm

My best friend’s dog’s uncle’s sister-in-law’s horses’ barn manager’s site has 324234 links: http://www.gabbr.com

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 6:47pm

Techcrunch has this story as
who spams digg the most

some of those on this list are very ethical and would never be likely to spam

Reply

Falko
October 4, 2007 at 9:06pm

HowtoForge has 7,520. Smile

Reply

October 4, 2007 at 9:35pm

itsecurity.com at 1250

Reply

Hem
October 5, 2007 at 5:30am

mine is at 487 link

Reply

October 5, 2007 at 8:31am

It would be interesting to compare rankings for submissions to homepages

Reply

October 5, 2007 at 5:26pm

Adobe has 6,400.

Reply

October 5, 2007 at 10:01pm

EcoGeek.org has 8,320

Reply

October 6, 2007 at 10:48am

Great post idea with some interesting stats, good work.

Reply

October 7, 2007 at 5:02am

interesting way of looking at things – my site pfadvice.com comes in a 1,140

Reply

October 7, 2007 at 7:24pm

Great little article. I found it very amusing. Smile

I checked, and it looks like One Man’s Blog is currently sitting at 1,930.

I had to check it like 3 times because I couldn’t believe it… but it’s there.

Incidentally, I’ve got a way you can embed this search in your page, so drop me an e-mail and I’ll share it with you. I’m going to link to your post including an embedded search in OMB tomorrow morning.

Take care, and thanks for the amusement.

John P.

Reply

October 8, 2007 at 12:19pm

Interesting post, these stats are really useful.

Reply

October 20, 2007 at 7:35am

Interesting, your numbers are about 20% lower than I am seeing. A few examples:
engadget 355,000
wikipedia 126,000
macrumors 34,900

Perhaps the difference is I am querying google US

Reply

February 10, 2008 at 3:06am

I discovered websites with more relevant and helpful contents than those that hit on the front page of Digg, but these sites are never noticed because they don’t belong to the culture of Digg and the West, perhaps.

Reply

Dan
September 9, 2008 at 12:10pm

I love this little article, nice idea and great job on gathering the statistics..
Yuvi has a nice example too in his site above :D

Reply

January 20, 2009 at 4:20am

mecozz.com is at 509,112

Reply

March 9, 2010 at 5:38am

I love the list, Digg is a great site and everyone should be using it. I hope I can get my Digg numbers up before everyone else gets too far ahead of me.

Reply

April 24, 2010 at 4:16am

very interesting information!

Reply

3 trackbacks

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Fields marked with an asterisk are required.
 

  *

  *

You can use one of the following tags:
<a href=""><blockquote><code><em><strike><strong>