<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did BigMouthMedia 302 Hijack Themselves Out of Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/did-bigmouthmedia-302-hijack-themselves-out-of-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/did-bigmouthmedia-302-hijack-themselves-out-of-google/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/did-bigmouthmedia-302-hijack-themselves-out-of-google/#comment-488477</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2385#comment-488477</guid>
		<description>Google is still so vulnerable to 302 SERP hijacking. I still don’t understand why don’t they treat 302 redirects the exact same way they treat 301. Just always show the f’ing target URL and put an end to this issue once and forever. Google’s stupidity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is still so vulnerable to 302 SERP hijacking. I still don’t understand why don’t they treat 302 redirects the exact same way they treat 301. Just always show the f’ing target URL and put an end to this issue once and forever. Google’s stupidity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: best speaker mounts</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/did-bigmouthmedia-302-hijack-themselves-out-of-google/#comment-415393</link>
		<dc:creator>best speaker mounts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 06:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2385#comment-415393</guid>
		<description>Its amazing how one little offset can cause your entire site to go away in google. People have to be so careful as to what they do with their websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its amazing how one little offset can cause your entire site to go away in google. People have to be so careful as to what they do with their websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wordpress Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/did-bigmouthmedia-302-hijack-themselves-out-of-google/#comment-395078</link>
		<dc:creator>Wordpress Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 08:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2385#comment-395078</guid>
		<description>The 302 hijack has been a bug in google for far too long, I can not believe they still can’t get a handle on it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 302 hijack has been a bug in google for far too long, I can not believe they still can’t get a handle on it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insomniac</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/did-bigmouthmedia-302-hijack-themselves-out-of-google/#comment-388570</link>
		<dc:creator>Insomniac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 07:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2385#comment-388570</guid>
		<description>I think it was another google bug :) I saw a lot of such</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was another google bug <img src='http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I saw a lot of such</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuKai SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/did-bigmouthmedia-302-hijack-themselves-out-of-google/#comment-283613</link>
		<dc:creator>SuKai SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2385#comment-283613</guid>
		<description>The 302 hijack has been a &quot;bug&quot; in google for far too long, I can not believe they still can&#039;t get a handle on it - whether its an accidental web master error - or a page hijack, far to easy IMO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 302 hijack has been a &#8220;bug&#8221; in google for far too long, I can not believe they still can&#8217;t get a handle on it &#8211; whether its an accidental web master error &#8211; or a page hijack, far to easy IMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/did-bigmouthmedia-302-hijack-themselves-out-of-google/#comment-269805</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2385#comment-269805</guid>
		<description>Really appreciated the way you handle your words.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really appreciated the way you handle your words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/did-bigmouthmedia-302-hijack-themselves-out-of-google/#comment-268149</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2385#comment-268149</guid>
		<description>Good story, I had not come across this one before... I know how easy it is from personal experience to misconfigure a server. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good story, I had not come across this one before&#8230; I know how easy it is from personal experience to misconfigure a server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/did-bigmouthmedia-302-hijack-themselves-out-of-google/#comment-258791</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 14:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2385#comment-258791</guid>
		<description>This is something new. I hope you would share why he is penalized or sandboxed in Google. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is something new. I hope you would share why he is penalized or sandboxed in Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medyumlar</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/did-bigmouthmedia-302-hijack-themselves-out-of-google/#comment-257043</link>
		<dc:creator>Medyumlar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 11:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2385#comment-257043</guid>
		<description> maybe to many links were added in the given period... 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe to many links were added in the given period&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/did-bigmouthmedia-302-hijack-themselves-out-of-google/#comment-243089</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2385#comment-243089</guid>
		<description>maybe to many links were added in the given period...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe to many links were added in the given period&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

