Search engine optimisation from Blogstorm

Google about to give Digg and Wikipedia huge traffic boost

by Patrick Altoft on July 24, 2007

Matt Cutts gave Digg & Wikipedia a nice piece of news last week at Wordcamp 2007. During the conference Matt was offering tips on search engine marketing to Wordpress bloggers and explained that Google is starting to treat underscores in URLs the same as hyphens. In the past hyphens were treated as word separators while underscores weren’t.

CNet has a good summary of the news:

One key development that Matt shared with the audience was that underscores in URLs are now (or at least very soon to be) treated as word separators by Google. That’s great news, because it historically hasn’t been that way. Back in 2005, Matt stated that Google did not view underscores in URLs as word separators. That meant that in a URL like http://www.mysite.com/iphone_review.html Googlebot couldn’t “see” the words iphone or review. Instead it read iphone_review as one word. I wouldn’t recommend targeting “iphone_review” as a keyword, as I doubt anyone will be including an underscore in their Google query.

Digg and Wikipedia are probably the largest sites that uses underscores and will see a huge increase in traffic. I’m not saying the increase in rankings for each page will be huge, far from it. However if each of Digg’s 2 million pages and Wikipedia’s 12 million pages ranks 1 place higher in the search results thats going to equate to a load of traffic.

The last thing we need is Wikipedia getting more search engine traffic.

You can get our blog posts delivered for free by email every day - simply add your email address to the box below or alternatively grab the RSS feed.

Read some similar posts

Published in: General delicious | digg | reddit | StumbleUpon | Google Bookmarks | Sphinn

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Sergi 24/07/2007 at 8:21 pm

>>Digg is probably the largest site that uses underscores

Good news for wikipedia too ~12 millions pages… ;)

2 Patrick Altoft 24/07/2007 at 8:49 pm

Wow, I didn’t even think of Wikipedia.

3 John King 25/07/2007 at 2:18 am

Its about Google got around to this, really underscores are quite a bit more friendly to the eye then dashes. The only area where dashes are better is that they’re more obtrusive so people notice them for the next time they need to type the URL.

4 Rose 25/07/2007 at 5:29 am

Thanks for the heads up on this.

5 Wolverine 01/08/2007 at 4:46 pm

Great news. I have been using underscores as separator on my sites and hence hopefully some new traffic will come my way. I do not have as many pages as Digg and Wikipedia but am close behind Smile

6 Spirulina Girl 03/12/2007 at 12:12 am

I agree that it’s about time google did this. I always used them on my sites but was never sure how google actually treated them. I did notice from serps though that it does still manage to pull the keyword from the url even if the url is in the format keyword1keyword2 etc.

Leave a Comment (get an avatar from Gravatar first)

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>