<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 83% of SEO&#8217;s don&#8217;t yet report paid links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cash Makers</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-122347</link>
		<dc:creator>Cash Makers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-122347</guid>
		<description>Only if site is competing with me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only if site is competing with me <img src='http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China Tours</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-45792</link>
		<dc:creator>China Tours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-45792</guid>
		<description>Google should make it to find the paid links throught their own technology to solve the problem. otherwise, it may cause more problems. What if someone intensionally trapped his competitors by reporting the paid links, which are created by himself, not his competitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google should make it to find the paid links throught their own technology to solve the problem. otherwise, it may cause more problems. What if someone intensionally trapped his competitors by reporting the paid links, which are created by himself, not his competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do SEOs Actually Report Paid Links? &#171; Internet Marketing Blog by Noon-an-Night</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-4360</link>
		<dc:creator>Do SEOs Actually Report Paid Links? &#171; Internet Marketing Blog by Noon-an-Night</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-4360</guid>
		<description>[...] Patrick Altoft from BlogStorm recently ran a poll asking visitors to his blog whether or not they report paid links that they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Patrick Altoft from BlogStorm recently ran a poll asking visitors to his blog whether or not they report paid links that they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry_T</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-4295</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry_T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-4295</guid>
		<description>Dare i say that almost all websites have paid for some listings in one form or another...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dare i say that almost all websites have paid for some listings in one form or another&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-4190</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-4190</guid>
		<description>I agree with Simon - the definition of &quot;paid&quot; is still confusing to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Simon &#8211; the definition of &#8220;paid&#8221; is still confusing to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting reads for the day &#171; Mathew Guiver.com - Search Engine Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-3930</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting reads for the day &#171; Mathew Guiver.com - Search Engine Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-3930</guid>
		<description>[...] 83% of SEOs donâ€™t yet report paid links.    Filed under: Latest News &amp; Good Reads  &#160;&#160;&#124;&#160;&#160; Tags: blogging, flickr, google, seo, video [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 83% of SEOs donâ€™t yet report paid links.    Filed under: Latest News &amp; Good Reads  &nbsp;&nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp; Tags: blogging, flickr, google, seo, video [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Building this Week (03.2008) &#124; Wiep.net</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-3826</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Building this Week (03.2008) &#124; Wiep.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-3826</guid>
		<description>[...] There was a lot of discussion about the good old paid link topic last week. Patrick Altoft opened with some examples showing that paid links still work (which was later backed up by Brian Combs), before unleashing a discussion about whether to report paid links or not. Turned out that 83% (including me) don&#8217;t report paid links. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There was a lot of discussion about the good old paid link topic last week. Patrick Altoft opened with some examples showing that paid links still work (which was later backed up by Brian Combs), before unleashing a discussion about whether to report paid links or not. Turned out that 83% (including me) don&#8217;t report paid links. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Dance</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-3788</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Dance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-3788</guid>
		<description>I think the question, that still remains somewhat ambiguous, is... what constitutes a paid link?

Si</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the question, that still remains somewhat ambiguous, is&#8230; what constitutes a paid link?</p>
<p>Si</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sir jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-3767</link>
		<dc:creator>sir jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-3767</guid>
		<description>my goodness, i love pie graphs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my goodness, i love pie graphs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnie</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-3766</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/83-of-seos-dont-yet-report-paid-links/#comment-3766</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t a NARC in the 80&#039;s, not going to be one now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t a NARC in the 80&#8242;s, not going to be one now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

