<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2 more product launches for Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/2-more-product-launches-for-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/2-more-product-launches-for-google/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and search engine optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bolton SEO Manchester</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/2-more-product-launches-for-google/#comment-237776</link>
		<dc:creator>Bolton SEO Manchester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3427#comment-237776</guid>
		<description>Google is always evolving, that&#039;s why they&#039;re number 1, and will stay that way for the forseeable future (despite Bing&#039;s latest efforts with their advertising campaign). I was reading an interview with Matt Cutts recently, and he was saying that at the moment, Google are focusing on localising search results, so if you search for something in the UK, you are primarily shown UK results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is always evolving, that&#8217;s why they&#8217;re number 1, and will stay that way for the forseeable future (despite Bing&#8217;s latest efforts with their advertising campaign). I was reading an interview with Matt Cutts recently, and he was saying that at the moment, Google are focusing on localising search results, so if you search for something in the UK, you are primarily shown UK results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/2-more-product-launches-for-google/#comment-211552</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3427#comment-211552</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing this Google SEO news. I am not yet familiar with a canonical  tag or page, but surely I will study further and know how will this affects my blog and its future movements. Anyway I can explore your blog to know more about this. Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing this Google SEO news. I am not yet familiar with a canonical  tag or page, but surely I will study further and know how will this affects my blog and its future movements. Anyway I can explore your blog to know more about this. Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/2-more-product-launches-for-google/#comment-211520</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3427#comment-211520</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s also worth noting that many people had concerns over confusing spiders with a &#039;loop&#039; if the canonical tag was also placed on the canonical page. This was refuted by Google as having no negative affect at all.

Just to put a few minds at rest!

Paul Martin
&lt;a href=&quot;www.cube3marketing.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cube3 Marketing&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;www.cube3marketing.com/digital&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Digital Marketing Agency&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also worth noting that many people had concerns over confusing spiders with a &#8216;loop&#8217; if the canonical tag was also placed on the canonical page. This was refuted by Google as having no negative affect at all.</p>
<p>Just to put a few minds at rest!</p>
<p>Paul Martin<br />
<a href="www.cube3marketing.com" rel="nofollow">Cube3 Marketing</a> &#8211; <a href="www.cube3marketing.com/digital" rel="nofollow">Digital Marketing Agency</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rinnell Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/2-more-product-launches-for-google/#comment-210821</link>
		<dc:creator>Rinnell Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 05:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3427#comment-210821</guid>
		<description>Big G is really moving at the speed of light these days leaving all of its competitors behind with a huge margin.  BTW I love google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big G is really moving at the speed of light these days leaving all of its competitors behind with a huge margin.  BTW I love google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prospect Solution</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/2-more-product-launches-for-google/#comment-210331</link>
		<dc:creator>Prospect Solution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 12:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3427#comment-210331</guid>
		<description>rel=canonical is like --&gt; When confronted with duplicate content, search engines will generally take one version and filter the others out. This can also happen when multiple domain names are involved, so while search engines are generally pretty good at choosing something reasonable, many webmasters prefer to make that decision themselves. 

It&#039;s really a good information.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospectsolution.com/writing-jobs-graduates.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Graduate Writing Jobs&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospectsolution.com/live-your-passion.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Live Your Passion&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rel=canonical is like &#8211;&gt; When confronted with duplicate content, search engines will generally take one version and filter the others out. This can also happen when multiple domain names are involved, so while search engines are generally pretty good at choosing something reasonable, many webmasters prefer to make that decision themselves. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s really a good information.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prospectsolution.com/writing-jobs-graduates.aspx" rel="nofollow">Graduate Writing Jobs</a> | <a href="http://www.prospectsolution.com/live-your-passion.aspx" rel="nofollow">Live Your Passion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Fairhead</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/2-more-product-launches-for-google/#comment-210208</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Fairhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3427#comment-210208</guid>
		<description>With the future of search being in question for the first time in a good while, I guess it makes sense that they are really pulling their fingers out to impress! Good catch, Patrick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the future of search being in question for the first time in a good while, I guess it makes sense that they are really pulling their fingers out to impress! Good catch, Patrick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Business Cookbook</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/2-more-product-launches-for-google/#comment-209752</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Business Cookbook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3427#comment-209752</guid>
		<description>Are Google spreading themselves too thin? Cell phones, TV, Radio...They are starting to look a bit like old school IBM. What&#039;s next, copiers?

I&#039;m looking forward to the cloudy Chrome though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are Google spreading themselves too thin? Cell phones, TV, Radio&#8230;They are starting to look a bit like old school IBM. What&#8217;s next, copiers?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to the cloudy Chrome though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valueshop</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/2-more-product-launches-for-google/#comment-208923</link>
		<dc:creator>valueshop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 17:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3427#comment-208923</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post. Google will make a record of  products. Nice sharing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post. Google will make a record of  products. Nice sharing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kakday</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/2-more-product-launches-for-google/#comment-208480</link>
		<dc:creator>kakday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3427#comment-208480</guid>
		<description>Q: I&#039;m offering my content / product descriptions for syndication. Do my publishers need to use rel=&quot;canonical&quot;?
A: Nobody will do it. Most ecommerce websites will suffer otherwise. John Mu, why do you lie to the people?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q: I&#8217;m offering my content / product descriptions for syndication. Do my publishers need to use rel=&#8221;canonical&#8221;?<br />
A: Nobody will do it. Most ecommerce websites will suffer otherwise. John Mu, why do you lie to the people?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raviaa</title>
		<link>http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/2-more-product-launches-for-google/#comment-207902</link>
		<dc:creator>Raviaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3427#comment-207902</guid>
		<description>@ Sparya said... &quot;Google wants to be number one&quot; - in what area?

Trying to please anyone is not smart in today&#039;s economy. I think Google would be smart enough to fully improve/optimize their current products/services and release new ones afterward</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Sparya said&#8230; &#8220;Google wants to be number one&#8221; &#8211; in what area?</p>
<p>Trying to please anyone is not smart in today&#8217;s economy. I think Google would be smart enough to fully improve/optimize their current products/services and release new ones afterward</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

